Implementing screening interventions in community pharmacy to promote interprofessional coordination of primary care - A mixed methods evaluation

被引:10
作者
Mc Namara, Kevin P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Krass, Ines [4 ]
Peterson, Gregory M. [5 ]
Alzubaidi, Hamzah [6 ,7 ]
Grenfell, Rob [8 ]
Freedman, Ben [9 ,10 ]
Dunbar, James A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Med, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Populat Hlth Res, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Pharm, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Tasmania, Fac Hlth, Sch Med, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[6] Univ Sharjah, Sharjah Inst Med Res, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[7] Univ Sharjah, Coll Pharm, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[8] CSIRO Hlth & Biosecur, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Heart Res Inst, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
关键词
Community pharmacy services; Mass screening; Primary care; Continuity of patient care; Cardiovascular diseases; Program evaluation; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK; PRIMARY PREVENTION; DIABETES RISK; HEALTH CHECK; SERVICE; PHYSICIANS; PROGRAMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.04.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Screening is a critical component of efforts to reduce the population burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), by facilitating early use of cost-effective prevention and treatment strategies. While international evidence suggests that screening in community pharmacies improves screening access and identifies at-risk individuals, concerns from medical organisations about the absence of interdisciplinary coordination and related lack of continuity of care with general practice have significantly contributed to reluctance from some stakeholders to endorse, and engage with, pharmacy-based screening initiatives. The Cardiovascular Absolute Risk Screening (CARS) study was designed to address these challenges and promote an interprofessional approach to screening for cardiovascular disease risk by pharmacists. This study describes the impact of the CARS implementation model on interdisciplinary coordination and continuity of care. Methods: In addition to clinical training, pharmacists at eleven participating pharmacies were provided with implementation training, resources and support to promote interprofessional coordination. Completion of training and pharmacy implementation plans, both of which highlighted GP engagement strategies, were prerequisites for screening commencement. Using mixed methods approaches, data were analyzed from screening records (n = 388), researcher interviews with patients at 6-10 weeks post-screening (n = 248, 64%), and pharmacist interviews (n = 10). Results: Screening records suggested that 94% of screened individuals were advised to seek formal GP assessment, and 98% consented to sharing of results. Among interviewed participants, 81% recalled direct pharmacist action to facilitate GP engagement. Among interviewees who had seen their GP already (n = 70), 79% reported that their GP was aware of the results (another 16% were uncertain). Pharmacists reported positive GP feedback stemming from efforts at early engagement, but an absence of ongoing collaboration. Conclusions: Use of implementation planning by pharmacists, alongside clinical training, can effectively promote an interdisciplinary coordination focus by pharmacists.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 167
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Case-finding for hepatitis C in primary care: a mixed-methods service evaluation
    Datta, Shivani
    Horwood, Jeremy
    Hickman, Matthew
    Sharp, Debbie
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (619) : E67 - E74
  • [42] Addressing food insecurity in rural primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation of barriers and facilitators
    Jordanova, Kayla E.
    Suresh, Arvind
    Canavan, Chelsey R.
    D'cruze, Tiffany
    Dev, Alka
    Boardman, Maureen
    Kennedy, Meaghan A.
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [43] The Vulvodynia Primary Care Toolkit: results of a mixed-method evaluation with community-based family physicians in British Columbia
    Hunker, Katherine E.
    Altas, Melanie
    Goldsmith, Kaitlyn M.
    Farrell, Janine E.
    Bouchard, Katrina N.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2025, 42 (01)
  • [44] Early development of primary care networks in the NHS in England: a qualitative mixed-methods evaluation
    Parkinson, Sarah
    Smith, Judith
    Sidhu, Manbinder
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [45] Using Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes to Enhance Substance Use Disorder Care in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study
    Koester, Mackenzie
    Motz, Rosemary
    Porto, Ariel
    Nieves, Nikita Reyes
    Ashley, Karen
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 10
  • [46] The Integrated Pain Team: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Impact of an Embedded Interdisciplinary Pain Care Intervention on Primary Care Team Satisfaction, Confidence, and Perceptions of Care Effectiveness
    Purcell, Natalie
    Zamora, Kara
    Tighe, Jenny
    Li, Yongmei
    Douraghi, Mathew
    Seal, Karen
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (09) : 1748 - 1763
  • [47] Barriers and facilitators of vision screening in the US pediatric primary care setting: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
    Killeen, Olivia J.
    Saylor, Kate M.
    Hogan, Caroline
    Jacobson, Adam
    Collins, Megan
    Ehrlich, Joshua R.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (05) : 985 - 992
  • [48] Understanding the Necessity of Trauma-Informed Care in Community Schools: A Mixed-Methods Program Evaluation
    Baez, Johanna Creswell
    Renshaw, Kristen J.
    Bachman, Lauren E. M.
    Kim, David
    Smith, Veronica D.
    Stafford, Rose E.
    CHILDREN & SCHOOLS, 2019, 41 (02) : 101 - 110
  • [49] Unpacking patient perspectives on social needs screening: A mixed methods study in western Colorado primary care practices
    Broaddus-Shea, Elena T.
    Jimenez-Zambrano, Andrea
    Holliman, Brooke Dorsey
    Connelly, Lauri
    Huebschmann, Amy G.
    Nederveld, Andrea
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 125
  • [50] An Examination of Multilevel Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Accountable Care Organization Settings: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Kim, Jungyoon
    Wang, Hongmei
    Young, Lufei
    Michaud, Tzeyu L.
    Siahpush, Mohammad
    Farazi, Paraskevi A.
    Chen, Li-Wu
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 562 - 570