Ensemble Learning Based Convex Approximation of Three-Phase Power Flow

被引:12
作者
Hu, Ren [1 ]
Li, Qifeng [1 ]
Qiu, Feng [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Convex approximation; data-driven; ensemble learning; power flow; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; REACTIVE POWER; RELAXATION; RECONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3055481
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Though the convex optimization has been widely used in power systems, it still cannot guarantee to yield a tight (accurate) solution to some problems. To mitigate this issue, this paper proposes an ensemble learning based convex approximation for alternating current (AC) power flow equations that differs from the existing convex relaxations. The proposed approach is based on three-phase quadratic power flow equations in rectangular coordinates. To develop this data-driven convex approximation of power flows, the polynomial regression (PR) is first deployed as a basic learner to fit convex relationships between the independent and dependent variables. Then, ensemble learning algorithms such as gradient boosting (GB) and bagging are introduced to combine learners to boost model performance. Based on the learned convex approximation of power flow, optimal power flow (OPF) is formulated as a convex quadratic programming problem. The simulation results on IEEE standard cases of both balanced and unbalanced systems show that, in the context of solving OPF, the proposed data-driven convex approximation outperforms the conventional semi-definite programming (SDP) relaxation in both accuracy and computational efficiency, especially in the cases that the conventional SDP relaxation fails.
引用
收藏
页码:4042 / 4051
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Optimal reconfiguration of distribution system connected with distributed generations: A review of different methodologies [J].
Badran, Ola ;
Mekhilef, Saad ;
Mokhlis, Hazlie ;
Dahalan, Wardiah .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 73 :854-867
[2]   Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems [J].
Bai, Xiaoqing ;
Wei, Hua ;
Fujisawa, Katsuki ;
Wang, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2008, 30 (6-7) :383-392
[3]   A preconditioned Newton algorithm for the nearest correlation matrix [J].
Borsdorf, Ruediger ;
Higham, Nicholas J. .
IMA JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (01) :94-107
[4]   Bagging predictors [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1996, 24 (02) :123-140
[5]  
Casella G., 2013, An Introduction to Statistical Learning
[6]   Practical Security Boundary-Constrained DC Optimal Power Flow for Electricity Markets [J].
Chavez-Lugo, Miguel ;
Fuerte-Esquivel, Claudio R. ;
Canizares, Claudio A. ;
Gutierrez-Martinez, Victor J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (05) :3358-3368
[7]   Measurement-Based Estimation of the Power Flow Jacobian Matrix [J].
Chen, Yu Christine ;
Wang, Jianhui ;
Dominguez-Garcia, Alejandro D. ;
Sauer, Peter W. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2016, 7 (05) :2507-2515
[8]   Measurement-Based Estimation of Linear Sensitivity Distribution Factors and Applications [J].
Chen, Yu Christine ;
Dominguez-Garcia, Alejandro D. ;
Sauer, Peter W. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (03) :1372-1382
[9]   The QC Relaxation: A Theoretical and Computational Study on Optimal Power Flow [J].
Coffrin, Carleton ;
Hijazi, Hassan L. ;
Van Hentenryck, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (04) :3008-3018
[10]   Sparse and Resilient Hierarchical Direct Load Control for Primary Frequency Response Improvement and Inter-Area Oscillations Damping [J].
Delavari, Atieh ;
Kamwa, Innocent .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (05) :5309-5318