Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications

被引:26
作者
Ladeira, Carlos E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Phys Therapy Program, Coll Allied Hlth & Sci, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
关键词
evidence based practice; guidelines; physical therapy; low back pain; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; EUROPEAN GUIDELINES; ORTHOPEDIC SECTION; PRIMARY-CARE; DISABILITY; EXPOSURE; QUALITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1590/S1413-35552011000300004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common disorder seen in physical therapy practice. There are several hundred clinical trials on the management of LBP. To summarize these trials, researchers wrote Evidence Based Practice (EBP) guidelines. This article reviewed the implications of EBP guidelines recommendations for physical therapy practice. Objectives: To review the recommendations for conservative management of LBP published in EBP guidelines since 2002. Methods: Searches were performed on the following databases: Google web searching engine, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Guideline Clearing House. Guidelines published in English and addressing conservative management of LBP were included. Results: Thirteen multidisciplinary and three mono-disciplinary guidelines met the inclusion criteria. LBP was triaged into three groups: with red flags, with radiculopathy, or non-specific. Patients without red flags could be safely managed without specialist referral. Patient education was recommended for all patients with LBP. There was an agreement to advise spine manipulation for patients with acute and sub-acute non-specific LBP. There was a consensus to recommend exercises for acute, sub-acute, and chronic LBP. Few guidelines addressed conservative management of LBP with radiculopathy. Overall, the guidelines did not offer specific advice for manipulation (hypomobility or instability) and exercise (stabilization or directional preference). Conclusion: Multidisciplinary guidelines focused on primary care and lacked details significant for physical therapy practice. There is a need for mono-disciplinary physical therapy guidelines to improve the balance between evidence and professional relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 199
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
AGREE Collaboration, 2006, APPR GUID RES EV AGR
[2]   Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[3]  
Albright J, 2001, PHYS THER, V81, P1641
[4]  
American Osteopathic Association, 2009, AM OST ASS GUID OST
[5]   A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment [J].
Arnau, JM ;
Vallano, A ;
Lopez, A ;
Pellisé, F ;
Delgado, MJ ;
Prat, N .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (05) :543-553
[6]  
Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group, 2003, EV BAS MAN AC PAIN
[7]  
Bekkering G., 2003, Physiotherapy, V89, P82, DOI [10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60579-2, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60579-2]
[8]  
Bigos SJ, 1994, ACUTE LOW BACK PROBL, P14
[9]   Quality of Low Back Pain Guidelines Improved [J].
Bouwmeester, Walter ;
van Enst, Annefloor ;
van Tulder, Maurits .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (23) :2562-2567
[10]   Mono-disciplinary or multidisciplinary back pain guidelines? How can we achieve a common message in primary care? [J].
Breen, Alan C. ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. ;
Koes, Bart W. ;
Jensen, Irene ;
Reardon, Rhoda ;
Bronfort, Gert .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (05) :641-647