共 50 条
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients Is It Beneficial?
被引:0
作者:
Shanmugasundaram, Madhan
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词:
Age factors;
angina;
unstable/complications/prevention;
control/therapy;
attitude of health personnel;
cardiovascular diseases/complications/mortality/prevention & control/therapy;
heart catheterization/utilization;
health services for the aged/standards;
myocardial revascularization/utilization;
randomized controlled trials as topic/statistics & numerical data;
risk factors;
survival analysis;
treatment outcome;
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
EARLY INVASIVE MANAGEMENT;
THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;
PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY;
FOLLOW-UP;
CONSERVATIVE STRATEGIES;
ARTERY-DISEASE;
REPERFUSION;
TRIAL;
AGE;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Persons aged 65 years or older, often referred to as the elderly, are a rapidly increasing population in the United States. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of morbidity and death in this age group, and acute coronary syndrome accounts for a significant proportion of the deaths. Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established treatment for acute coronary syndrome and symptomatic coronary artery disease. However, community studies have shown that elderly patients are less likely to undergo revascularization, perhaps due to a "treatment-risk" paradox: elderly patients at higher risk of morbidity and death from acute coronary syndrome are denied revascularization even though they are likely to benefit from it. Age alone is one of the many reasons why percutaneous coronary intervention is avoided in elderly patients. This review examines past clinical trials and the existing evidence that supports performing percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients. (Tex Heart Inst J 2011;38(4):398-403)
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 403
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条