Economic and Efficiency Analysis of China Electricity Market Reform Using Computable General Equilibrium Model

被引:12
作者
Yin, Jieting [1 ]
Yan, Qingyou [2 ]
Lei, Kaijie [3 ]
Balezentis, Tomas [4 ]
Streimikiene, Dalia [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Wuzi Univ, Sch Informat, Beijing 101149, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] GuangDong Power Grid Corp, DongGuan Power Supply Bur, Dongguan 523008, Peoples R China
[4] Lithuanian Inst Agr Econ, LT-01113 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
electricity market reform; computable general equilibrium (CGE) model; liberalisation; regulation; China; CGE; ENERGY; IMPACT; CONSUMPTION; RESOURCE; STANDARD;
D O I
10.3390/su11020350
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's electricity industry has been undergoing a process of regulatory reform. This study aims to analyse the impact of liberalization on the electricity market assuming different degrees of scope of the reforms by applying a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. In this paper, we consider the three sub-sectors of the electricity industry, namely generation, transmission and distribution. We assume that the reform will phase out the entry barriers on the generation side and allow for competition on the distribution side, while keeping the transmission side under regulation. The results showed that the reform could enhance efficiency in the electricity sector and reduce energy prices for households. Introduction of a complete competition model would decrease welfare by 5.394 billion yuan, if contrasted to a limited competition model. The composite energy price would decline under both scenarios, whereas the quantity of energy consumed by the households would go up. This research, thus, contributes to literature on the economic effects of China's electric power market reform, and can be used as a case study to support policy decisions for the decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Regulation, efficiency and equilibrium: A general equilibrium analysis of liberalization in the Turkish electricity market [J].
Akkemik, K. Ali ;
Oguz, Fuat .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) :3282-3292
[2]   Energy efficiency and economic growth: A retrospective CGE analysis for Canada from 2002 to 2012 [J].
Bataille, Chris ;
Melton, Noel .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 :118-130
[3]   Assessment of the macroeconomic and sectoral effects of higher electricity and gas prices in the EU: A general equilibrium modeling approach [J].
Capros, Pantelis ;
Paroussos, Leonidas ;
Charalampidis, Ioannis ;
Fragkiadakis, Kostas ;
Karkatsoulis, Panagiotis ;
Tsani, Stella .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2016, 9 :18-27
[4]   Factors influencing green purchase behavior of millennials in India [J].
Chaudhary, Richa ;
Bisai, Samrat .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 29 (05) :798-812
[5]  
Chen JD, 2018, TRANSFORM BUS ECON, V17, P112
[6]  
Fan M.T., 2000, J WORLD EC, V4, P16
[7]   Economic and environmental analyses of Iranian energy subsidy reform using Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model [J].
Farajzadeh, Zakariya ;
Bakhshoodeh, Mohammad .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 27 :147-154
[8]   Policy options for non-grain bioethanol in China: Insights from an economy-energy-environment CGE model [J].
Ge, Jianping ;
Lei, Yalin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 105 :502-511
[9]  
He J., 2002, Quant. Econ. Technol. Econ. Res, V10, P39
[10]   Economic analysis of coal price-electricity price adjustment in China based on the CGE model [J].
He, Y. X. ;
Zhang, S. L. ;
Yang, L. Y. ;
Wang, Y. J. ;
Wang, J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :6629-6637