Optimal expectations

被引:384
作者
Brunnermeier, MK [1 ]
Parker, JA
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Bendheim Ctr Finance, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/0002828054825493
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Forward-looking agents care about expected future utility flows, and hence have higher current felicity if they are optimistic. This paper studies utility-based biases in beliefs by supposing that beliefs maximize average felicity, optimally balancing this benefit of optimism against the costs of worse decision making. A small optimistic bias in beliefs typically leads to first-order gains in anticipatory utility and only second-order costs in realized outcomes. In a portfolio choice example, investors overestimate their return and exhibit a preference for skewness; in general equilibrium, investors' prior beliefs are endogenously heterogeneous. In a consumption-saving example, consumers are both overconfident and overoptimistic.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1118
页数:27
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
AKERLOF GA, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P307
[2]  
Alpert M., 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY, P294, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511809477.022, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.022]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
[4]  
Attanasio OP, 1999, HBK ECON, V15, P741
[5]   AGREEING TO DISAGREE [J].
AUMANN, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1976, 4 (06) :1236-1239
[6]  
BARBERIS NC, 2005, UNPUB STOCKS LOTTERI
[7]   The unbearable automaticity of being [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Chartrand, TL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (07) :462-479
[8]   Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study [J].
Barsky, RB ;
Juster, FT ;
Kimball, MS ;
Shapiro, MD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :537-579
[9]   Willpower and personal rules [J].
Bénabou, R ;
Tirole, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 112 (04) :848-886
[10]   Self-confidence and personal motivation [J].
Bénabou, R ;
Tirole, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (03) :871-915