Energy and carbon emission payback analysis for energy-efficient retrofitting in buildings-Overhang shading option

被引:83
作者
Huang, Yu [1 ]
Niu, Jian-lei [1 ]
Chung, Tse-ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg Serv Engn, Fac Construct & Land Use, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Radiation heat gain; Energy saving; Embodied energy; CO2; emission; Payback period; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSTRUCTION; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy-efficient retrofitting of existing building is a huge contribution to the sustainability of the society since building energy consumption takes more than one fourth of total energy consumption. The application of external shading system could block out unwanted radiant heat gain, thus reduces the cooling load of the air-conditioning system. During the assessment of energy-efficient retrofitting projects, apart from annual saving figures and economic payback time, energy and CO2 emission payback periods should also be taken as indispensable references. In this paper, a methodology is described for analyzing the energy and CO2 emission payback periods of external overhang shading in a university campus in Hong Kong. Result shows that due to requirements of structural strength under typhoon situation, although introducing overhang shading system could reduce almost half of the cooling load in the related area, the energy and CO2 emission payback periods of the project are still unrealistically long. This case study presents an example of multi-disciplinary approach being not only important to the energy-efficient retrofitting but also necessary for policy making in different climatic and geographic regions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: A method [J].
Adalberth, K .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (04) :317-320
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ASHRAE HDB FUND
[3]   A LIFE-CYCLE APPROACH IN BUILDING [J].
BEKKER, PCF .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 17 (01) :55-61
[4]  
Bolin C.A., 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P630
[5]   ENERGY AND CARBON-DIOXIDE IMPLICATIONS OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION [J].
BUCHANAN, AH ;
HONEY, BG .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 1994, 20 (03) :205-217
[6]   Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics [J].
Corbière-Nicollier, T ;
Gfeller-Laban, B ;
Lundquist, L ;
Leterrier, Y ;
Månson, JAE ;
Jolliet, O .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2001, 33 (04) :267-287
[7]   Life Cycle Assessment of the inclusion of phase change materials (PCM) in experimental buildings [J].
de Gracia, Alvaro ;
Rincon, Lidia ;
Castell, Albert ;
Jimenez, Melanie ;
Boer, Dieter ;
Medrano, Marc ;
Cabeza, Luisa F. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (09) :1517-1523
[8]   Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials:: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact [J].
González, MJ ;
Navarro, JG .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 41 (07) :902-909
[9]   Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings [J].
Gustavsson, Leif ;
Joelsson, Anna .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (02) :210-220
[10]   Retrofitting the existing UK building stock [J].
Kelly, Michael J. .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2009, 37 (02) :196-200