Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory

被引:45
作者
Boone, WR
Johnson, JE
Locke, AJ
Crane, MM
Price, TM
机构
[1] Greenville Hosp Syst, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
[2] Greenville Hosp Syst, Dept Res, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
关键词
air quality; cleanroom; particle counts; in vitro fertilization; embryo development;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00395-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effect of improved air quality on IVF and subsequent embryo development. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Hospital-based IVF facility composed of an anteroom, a cleanroom, and an adjacent operating room. Patient(s): Two-hundred seventy-five couples requesting IVF between 1993 and 1997. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Particle counts (sizes 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mu m); IVF rates; and embryo quality (stage and grade). Result(s): Clinical pregnancy rates decreased from 35% in 1993 to 16% in 1994 (numerous construction odors were detected during 1994) and increased steadily after the cleanroom was built (rates for 1995-1997 were 20%. 32%, and 59%, respectively). Fertilization rates decreased between 1993 (74%) and 1994 (60%) and then steadily increased after cleanroom installation (62% in 1995, 71% in 1996, and 69% in 1997). The proportion of embryos past the four-cell stage decreased from 66% in 1993 to 61% in 1994 bur then increased steadily in the years after the cleanroom was built (78%, 77%, and 83% in 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively). During the same 5-year period, there were no differences in embryo quality or number of embryos transferred. Conclusion(s): Construction of a Class 100 cleanroom improved air quality and IVF rate and increased the number of embryos past the four-cell stage available for transfer. (C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assisted reproductive technology in SLE and APS
    Levine, A. B.
    Lockshin, M. D.
    [J]. LUPUS, 2014, 23 (12) : 1239 - 1241
  • [32] Gestational carrier in assisted reproductive technology
    Murugappan, Gayathree
    Farland, Leslie V.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Correia, Katharine F.
    Anchan, Raymond M.
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (03) : 420 - 428
  • [33] Update on obesity and assisted reproductive technology
    Elnashar, Aboubakr Mohamed
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [34] Assisted reproductive technology: The state of the ART
    Hummel, WP
    Kettel, LM
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1997, 29 (03) : 207 - 214
  • [35] Tuberculosis in pregnancy and assisted reproductive technology
    Cao, Wenli
    Fu, Xiayan
    Li, Haiyang
    Bei, Jialu
    Li, Lisha
    Wang, Ling
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERIES AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 18 (02) : 80 - 88
  • [36] Assisted reproductive technology in Saudi Arabia
    Abduljabbar, Hassan S.
    Amin, Rubina
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (04) : 461 - 464
  • [37] Acupuncture in assisted reproductive technology and PCOS
    Stener-Victorin E.
    Von Hagens C.
    [J]. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, 2008, 6 (2) : 67 - 71
  • [38] Assisted reproductive technology and ovarian cancer
    Devesa, M.
    Barri, P. N.
    Coroleu, B.
    [J]. MINERVA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 2010, 35 (04) : 247 - 257
  • [39] Endometrioma and assisted reproductive technology: a review
    Mira H. Kheil
    Fady I. Sharara
    Jean Marc Ayoubi
    Sara Rahman
    Gaby Moawad
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 283 - 290
  • [40] Immunological Testing in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Odendaal, Joshua
    Quenby, Siobhan
    [J]. SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 39 (01/02) : 13 - 23