Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking:: Experiences from norwegian municipal benchmarking networks

被引:94
作者
Askim, Jostein [1 ]
Johnsen, Age [2 ]
Christophersen, Knut-Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Oslo Univ Coll, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jopart/mum012
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Benchmarking rests on the assumption that it supports organizational learning and innovation, but the empirical knowledge that underpins this perceived means-end relationship is limited. This article draws on existing research to develop a framework for analyzing organizational learning outcomes from municipal benchmarking. The framework incorporates explanatory factors at different levels (network and municipality), and with different time perspectives (past and present). Empirical results from a nationwide Norwegian benchmarking project indicate that municipalities do obtain organizational learning from benchmarking but that care must be taken when organizational learning is conceptualized and assessed. Learning should incorporate aiding agenda setting and decision making, as well as changes. Factors such as network and administrative characteristics and management and political participation are found to influence learning outcomes. There are also indications that learning from benchmarking is subject to politics. Notably, nonsocialist political regimes are less receptive to organizational learning than other regimes and political competition enhances organizational learning from benchmarking.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 320
页数:24
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Big questions in public network management research [J].
Agranoff, R ;
McGuire, M .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2001, 11 (03) :295-326
[2]   Performance-comparison projects in local government: Participants' perspectives [J].
Ammons, DN ;
Coe, C ;
Lombardo, M .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2001, 61 (01) :100-110
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1937, National Municipal Review
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Public Management Review
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Evaluation
[6]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[7]  
ASKIM J, 2004, LEISTUNGSMESSUNG LEI, P277
[8]  
BALDERSHEIM H, 2002, POLITICAL LEADERSHIP, P1
[9]  
BARZELAY M, IN PRESSGOVERNANCE
[10]   Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures [J].
Behn, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) :586-606