National Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions After Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lung Cancer Resection

被引:25
|
作者
Bhagat, Rohun
Bronsert, Michael R.
Ward, Austin N.
Martin, Jeremiah
Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
Glebova, Natalia O.
Henderson, William G.
Fullerton, David
Weyant, Michael J.
Mitchell, John D.
Meguid, Robert A.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Surg Outcomes & Appl Res Program SOAR, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Adult & Child Ctr Hlth Outcomes Res & Delivery Sc, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[5] Southern Ohio Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Portsmouth, OH USA
[6] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; PULMONARY LOBECTOMY; VASCULAR-SURGERY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; RISK-FACTORS; THORACOTOMY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Hospital readmissions are viewed as a mark of inferior health care quality and are penalized. Unplanned postoperative readmission reason and timing after lung resection are not well understood. We examine related, unplanned readmissions after thoracoscopic versus open anatomic lung resections to identify opportunities to improve patient care. Methods. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set, 2012 to 2015, characterizing 30-day related, unplanned postoperative readmissions after anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer. Risk-adjusted comparison of readmission after thoracoscopic and open resection was performed using propensity matching. Results. Patients (n = 9,510) underwent anatomic lung resections; 4,935 (51.9%) were thoracoscopic resections and 4,575 (48.1%) were open resections. Of the thoracoscopic patients, 10.9% experienced one or more complications, versus 19.4% of patients with open resection (p < 0.0001). Of the thoracoscopic patients 5.5% experienced related, unplanned readmissions versus 7.2% of the patients with open resection (p < 0.001). 24.8% of complications after thoracoscopic approach occurred after discharge, versus 15.5% after open approach (p < 0.0001). Timing of unplanned readmission was similar for both groups. The propensity-matched odds ratio of risk of readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resection was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.949 to 1.411, p = 0.15). Conclusions. Open anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer had nearly twice the complication rate but only a slightly higher readmission rate than thoracoscopic resection. More complications occurred after discharge after thoracoscopic than open resections. Most readmissions occurred within 2 weeks after both thoracoscopic and open resections. Risk-adjusted comparison identified no statistically significant difference in risk of related, unplanned readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resections. Future studies should focus on identification of processes of care to decrease complications and unplanned readmissions after lung cancer resection. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1782 / 1790
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Readmissions After Complex Cancer Surgery: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database
    Zafar, Syed Nabeel
    Shah, Adil A.
    Nembhard, Christine
    Wilson, Lori L.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Raoof, Mustafa
    Wasif, Nabil
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (06) : 373 - +
  • [42] Cost and survival of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy in lung cancer patients: a propensity score-matched study
    Marijic, Pavo
    Walter, Julia
    Schneider, Christian
    Schwarzkopf, Larissa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 57 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [43] Analysis for discharge within 2 days after thoracoscopic anatomic lung cancer surgery
    Xu, Yuanyuan
    Chen, Xiaoke
    Ren, Jianghao
    Zhu, Mingyang
    Li, Ruonan
    Huang, Jiazheng
    Yao, Yaxian
    Zhang, Zhengmin
    Tan, Qiang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (12): : 13054 - 13062
  • [44] Thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for lung metastases of colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis using propensity score adjustment
    Murakawa, Tomohiro
    Sato, Hajime
    Okumura, Sakae
    Nakajima, Jun
    Horio, Hirotoshi
    Ozeki, Yuichi
    Asamuraf, Hisao
    Ikeda, Norihiko
    Otsuka, Hajime
    Matsuguma, Haruhisa
    Yoshino, Ichiro
    Chida, Masayuki
    Nakayama, Mitsuo
    Iizasa, Toshihiko
    Okumura, Meinoshin
    Shiono, Satoshi
    Kato, Ryoichi
    Iida, Tomohiko
    Matsutani, Noriyuki
    Kawamura, Masafumi
    Sakao, Yukinori
    Funai, Kazuhito
    Furuyashiki, Go
    Akiyama, Hirohiko
    Sugiyama, Shigeki
    Kanauchi, Naoki
    Shiraishi, Yuji
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (06) : 1157 - 1163
  • [45] Modified Thoracoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Curative Resection of Oesophageal Cancer
    Yuan, Y. C.
    Xia, Z. K.
    Yin, N.
    Yin, B. L.
    Hu, J. G.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (03) : 904 - 911
  • [46] Thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with impaired pulmonary function: analysis from a national database
    Bongiolatti, Stefano
    Gonfiotti, Alessandro
    Vokrri, Eduart
    Borgianni, Sara
    Crisci, Roberto
    Curcio, Carlo
    Voltolini, Luca
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 30 (06) : 803 - 811
  • [47] Evolution of the early respiratory function after lung resection for cancer
    Filaire, M.
    Bailly, P.
    Chadeyras, J. -B.
    Galvaing, G.
    Naamee, A.
    Aubreton, S.
    Taheri, H.
    Thooris, V.
    Escande, G.
    REVUE DE PNEUMOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2009, 65 (02) : 85 - 92
  • [48] Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy in infants with congenital lung malformations: A multi-institutional propensity score analysis
    Weller, Jennine H.
    St Peter, Shawn D.
    Fallat, Mary E.
    Saito, Jacqueline M.
    Burns, Cartland R.
    Deans, Katherine J.
    Fraser, Jason D.
    Gadepalli, Samir K.
    Helmrath, Michael A.
    Hirschl, Ronald B.
    Kabre, Rashmi
    Lal, Dave R.
    Landman, Matthew P.
    Leys, Charles M.
    Mak, Grace Z.
    Minneci, Peter C.
    Wright, Tiffany N.
    Kunisaki, Shaun M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2021, 56 (12) : 2148 - 2156
  • [49] Unplanned Reoperation After Craniotomy for Tumor: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
    Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar H.
    Yan, Sandra C.
    Chavakula, Vamsi
    Gormley, William B.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Claus, Elizabeth B.
    Dunn, Ian F.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (05) : 761 - 771
  • [50] Thoracoscopic surgery and conventional open thoracotomy in metastatic lung cancer - A comparative clinical analysis of surgical outcomes
    Nakajima, J
    Takamoto, S
    Tanaka, M
    Takeuchi, E
    Murakawa, T
    Fukami, T
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (08): : 849 - 853