National Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions After Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lung Cancer Resection

被引:25
|
作者
Bhagat, Rohun
Bronsert, Michael R.
Ward, Austin N.
Martin, Jeremiah
Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
Glebova, Natalia O.
Henderson, William G.
Fullerton, David
Weyant, Michael J.
Mitchell, John D.
Meguid, Robert A.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Surg Outcomes & Appl Res Program SOAR, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Adult & Child Ctr Hlth Outcomes Res & Delivery Sc, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[5] Southern Ohio Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Portsmouth, OH USA
[6] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; PULMONARY LOBECTOMY; VASCULAR-SURGERY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; RISK-FACTORS; THORACOTOMY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Hospital readmissions are viewed as a mark of inferior health care quality and are penalized. Unplanned postoperative readmission reason and timing after lung resection are not well understood. We examine related, unplanned readmissions after thoracoscopic versus open anatomic lung resections to identify opportunities to improve patient care. Methods. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set, 2012 to 2015, characterizing 30-day related, unplanned postoperative readmissions after anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer. Risk-adjusted comparison of readmission after thoracoscopic and open resection was performed using propensity matching. Results. Patients (n = 9,510) underwent anatomic lung resections; 4,935 (51.9%) were thoracoscopic resections and 4,575 (48.1%) were open resections. Of the thoracoscopic patients, 10.9% experienced one or more complications, versus 19.4% of patients with open resection (p < 0.0001). Of the thoracoscopic patients 5.5% experienced related, unplanned readmissions versus 7.2% of the patients with open resection (p < 0.001). 24.8% of complications after thoracoscopic approach occurred after discharge, versus 15.5% after open approach (p < 0.0001). Timing of unplanned readmission was similar for both groups. The propensity-matched odds ratio of risk of readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resection was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.949 to 1.411, p = 0.15). Conclusions. Open anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer had nearly twice the complication rate but only a slightly higher readmission rate than thoracoscopic resection. More complications occurred after discharge after thoracoscopic than open resections. Most readmissions occurred within 2 weeks after both thoracoscopic and open resections. Risk-adjusted comparison identified no statistically significant difference in risk of related, unplanned readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resections. Future studies should focus on identification of processes of care to decrease complications and unplanned readmissions after lung cancer resection. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1782 / 1790
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative Complications Drive Unplanned Readmissions After Esophagectomy for Cancer
    Bhagat, Rohun
    Bronsert, Michael R.
    Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
    Weyant, Michael J.
    Mitchell, John D.
    Glebova, Natalia O.
    Henderson, William G.
    Fullerton, David
    Meguid, Robert A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (05) : 1476 - 1482
  • [2] Short-Term Readmissions After Open, Thoracoscopic, and Robotic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Based on the Nationwide Readmissions Database
    Bailey, Katherine L.
    Merchant, Natalie
    Seo, Young-Ji
    Elashoff, David
    Benharash, Peyman
    Yanagawa, Jane
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (05) : 1377 - 1384
  • [3] Open versus Thoracoscopic RFA-Assisted Lung Resection
    Poupalou, Anna
    Kontos, Michael
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Papalois, Apostolos
    Kavantzas, Nikolaos
    Agrogiannis, George
    Yagoubi, Fatima
    Tomos, Periklis
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (06) : 403 - 409
  • [4] Unplanned readmission after lung resection surgery: A systematic review
    Garcia-Tirado, Javier
    Judez-Legaristi, Diego
    Salvador Landa-Oviedo, Hugo
    Maria Miguelena-Bobadilla, Jose
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2019, 97 (03): : 128 - 144
  • [5] National evaluation of risk factors for unplanned readmission after lung resection
    Pons, Aina
    Guirao, Angela
    Fibla, Juan J.
    Carvajal, Carlos
    Embun, Raul
    Sanchez, David
    Hernandez, Jorge
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 61 (06) : 1251 - 1257
  • [6] Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy After Induction Therapy for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: New Study Results and Meta-analysis
    Hireche, Kheira
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Lounes, Youcef
    Aouinti, Safa
    Molinari, Nicolas
    Alric, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 276 : 416 - 432
  • [7] Readmissions after lung resection in France: The PMSI database
    Moret, A.
    Madelaine, L.
    Cottenet, J.
    Mariet, A. Sophie
    Quantin, C.
    Bernard, A.
    Pages, P. B.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2021, 38 (07) : 673 - 680
  • [8] Unplanned Readmissions After Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Wu, Darrell
    Price, Matt D.
    Amarasekara, Hiruni S.
    Green, Susan Y.
    Woodside, Sandra J.
    Tullos, Adam
    Zhang, Qianzi
    Coselli, Joseph S.
    LeMaire, Scott A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (01) : 228 - 234
  • [9] Underestimation of Unplanned Readmission after Colorectal Surgery: A National Analysis
    Rattan, Rishi
    Parreco, Joshua
    Lindenmaier, Laurence B.
    Yeh, Daniel Dante
    Zakrison, Tanya L.
    Pust, Gerd D.
    Sands, Laurence R.
    Namias, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (04) : 382 - 390
  • [10] VATS Versus Open Surgery for Lung Cancer Resection: Moving Beyond the Incision
    Cheng, Aaron M.
    Wood, Douglas E.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (02): : 166 - 170