Developing a critical agenda to understand pro-environmental actions: contributions from Social Representations and Social Practices Theories

被引:75
作者
Batel, Susana [1 ]
Castro, Paula [1 ]
Devine-Wright, Patrick [2 ]
Howarth, Caroline [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Cis IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Exeter, Dept Geog, Exeter EX4 4QJ, Devon, England
[3] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Social Psychol, London, England
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; PLACE-IDENTITY; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY; TRANSITIONS; TECHNOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; BEHAVIOR; PRESS; COMMUNICATION; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.417
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Debates over the value and compatibility of different approaches to understanding and changing environmental-relevant actions proliferate across the social sciences. This article reviews and discusses some of the (socio-)psychological and sociological approaches in those debates. We will start by critically reviewing the (socio-)psychological perspectives, highlighting two main shortcomings. First, they are often partial in their focusconcentrating on the consumption side of climate-relevant actions and, relatedly in changing these actions at the individual level. They tend to assume that individual change equates to social change and, with that, fail to contextualize anti'-environmental actions in current neoliberal, capitalist societies. Second, they usually present the mainstream (socio-)psychological approaches, which are ontologically individualistic and cognitive, as the only existent ones, therefore neglecting other perspectives within Social Psychology which might actually be (more) compatible with sociological perspectives. We then suggest that Social Representations Theory (SRT), as an ontologically social-psychological approach and a theory of social change, might be reconciled with sociological approaches, such as Social Practices Theory (SPT), in contrast to the more individualistic (socio-)psychological perspectives. After reviewing the main tenets of SRT, its discrepancies and potential synergies with SPT, we discuss how both can be articulated to understand different stages of the social change process toward more environmentally sustainable societies. While SPT might be more suitable to understand stability or how some actions become habitual, SRT might be better equipped to understand how those change, or how individuals and groups negotiate new actions with old ones. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:727-745. doi: 10.1002/wcc.417 For further resources related to this article, please visit the .
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 745
页数:19
相关论文
共 120 条
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Men as individuals, women as a sexed category:: Implications of symbolic asymmetry for feminist practice and feminist psychology [J].
Amâncio, L ;
Oliveira, JM .
FEMINISM & PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 16 (01) :35-43
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, UN C ENV DEV
[5]  
[Anonymous], REFLEXITIVITY CHANGE
[6]  
Anthony Giddens, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01173303
[7]   New racism, meritocracy and individualism: constraining affirmative action in education [J].
Augoustinos, M ;
Tuffin, K ;
Every, D .
DISCOURSE & SOCIETY, 2005, 16 (03) :315-340
[8]  
Augoustinos M., 1995, Social cognition: An integrated introduction, V2nd
[9]   A smarter choice? Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmentally sustainable mobility [J].
Barr, Stewart ;
Prillwitz, Jan .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (01) :1-19
[10]   Sustainable lifestyles: sites, practices, and policy [J].
Barr, Stewart ;
Shaw, Gareth ;
Coles, Tim .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2011, 43 (12) :3011-3029