To shred or not to shred: A comparative techno-economic assessment of lithium ion battery hydrometallurgical recycling retaining value and improving circularity in LIB supply chains

被引:86
作者
Thompson, Dana [1 ,2 ]
Hyde, Charlotte [1 ]
Hartley, Jennifer M. [1 ,2 ]
Abbott, Andrew P. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [2 ,3 ]
Harper, Gavin D. J. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Sch Chem, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[2] Faraday Inst, Quad One,Harwell Sci & Innovat Campus, Didcot, Oxon, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Chem, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Met & Mat, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Lithium-ion batteries; Recycling; Shredding; Hydrometallurgy; Circular economy; Techno-economic analysis; ELECTROLYTE ADDITIVES; RECOVERY; FUTURE; AUTOMATION; SEPARATION; COST; MN;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105741
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Present techniques for recycling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) tend to employ shredding as a preliminary step. This results in size reduction and passivation of reactive components. However, it also delivers lower purity products, decreasing process economics. We propose that disassembly followed by delamination retains product value and simplifies downstream chemistries. A retro-economic analysis shows the theoretical cost of reprocessing for a hypothetical $100 / kWh battery. Ten different hydrometallurgical approaches to LIB recycling are contrasted through techno-economic analysis of the wet part of the process. We show that shredded material can be recycled into new cathode material with a cost saving of up to 20%. Comparable processes using disassembled cells enable up to 80% cost saving (not accounting for the actual step of disassembling the cell). In the light of these results, we set out the barriers to disassembly of LIB cells, recommending the importance of design for disassembly as key to improving the circularity of LIB supply chains, ensuring that greater value is retained within the system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Ahuja Jyoti, 2021, J BUS LAW
  • [2] Adaptation of minerals processing operations for lithium-ion (LiBs) and nickel metal hydride (NiMH) batteries recycling: Critical review
    Al-Thyabat, S.
    Nakamura, T.
    Shibata, E.
    Iizuka, A.
    [J]. MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2013, 45 : 4 - 17
  • [3] Techno-economic and environmental disassembly planning of lithium-ion electric vehicle battery packs for remanufacturing
    Alfaro-Algaba, M.
    Javier Ramirez, F.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 154
  • [4] Material availability and the supply chain: Risks, effects, and responses
    Alonso, Elisa
    Gregory, Jeremy
    Field, Frank
    Kirchain, Randolph
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (19) : 6649 - 6656
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, NEOMETALS
  • [6] Pyrometallurgical recycling of Li-ion, Ni-Cd and Ni-MH batteries: A minireview
    Assefi, Mohammad
    Maroufi, Samane
    Yamauchi, Yusuke
    Sahajwalla, Veena
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2020, 24 : 26 - 31
  • [7] Circular economy strategies for electric vehicle batteries reduce reliance on raw materials
    Baars, Joris
    Domenech, Teresa
    Bleischwitz, Raimund
    Melin, Hans Eric
    Heidrich, Oliver
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [8] Leaching and separation of Co and Mn from electrode materials of spent lithium-ion batteries using hydrochloric acid: Laboratory and pilot scale study
    Barik, S. P.
    Prabaharan, G.
    Kumar, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 147 : 37 - 43
  • [9] Lithium Recovery from Challenging Deposits: Zinnwaldite and Magnesium-Rich Salt Lake Brines
    Bertau, Martin
    Voigt, Wolfgang
    Schneider, Anke
    Martin, Gunther
    [J]. CHEMBIOENG REVIEWS, 2017, 4 (06): : 360 - 376
  • [10] Environment-friendly technology for recovering cathode materials from spent lithium iron phosphate batteries
    Bi, Haijun
    Zhu, Huabing
    Zu, Lei
    Gao, Yong
    Gao, Song
    Bai, Yuxuan
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (08) : 911 - 920