The Comparative Assessment of the Effects of Two Methods of Pressure Support Adjustment on Respiratory Distress in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation admitted to Intensive Care Units

被引:0
作者
Barati, Pooneh [1 ]
Ghafari, Somayeh [2 ]
Saghaei, Mahmood [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Nursing & Midwifery Care Res Ctr, Crit Care Nursing, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Nursing & Midwifery Care Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesia, Esfahan, Iran
[4] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Anesthesiol & Crit Care Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Intensive care unit; Mechanical ventilation; Pressure support; Respiratory distress; BREATHING INDEX; PATTERN; WORK;
D O I
10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23960
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Incorrect adjustment of the respiratory parameters of the mechanical ventilator increases respiratory distress and work of breathing (WOB) in mechanically ventilated patients.The accurate adjustment of pressure support increases the patient's comfort and decreases respiratory distress and WOB, etc.; thus, the present study was conducted to compare the effects of two pressure support adjustment methods on respiratory distress in patients under mechanical ventilation to investigate whether the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) method can reduce patients' respiratory distress more and faster than the tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR) methods. Patients and methods:The study was conducted in 2020 on 56 mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory distress.The patients' respiratory distress was first measured using RSBI and the respiratory distress observation scale (RDOS). The pressure support was then adjusted in the patients according to the RSBI (in the trial group, n = 33) and VT and RR (in the control group, n = 23). The patients' respiratory distress was measured again in both groups 15 and 30 minutes after the pressure support adjustment. Results: The results showed no significant differences between the two groups in the mean RSBI and RDOS before (p = 0.374, p = 0.657 respectively) and 30 (p = 0.103, p = 0.218 respectively) minutes after the adjustment of the pressure support, but these mean values differed significantly (p = 0.025 for RSBI and p= 0.044 for RDOS) between the groups 15 minutes after the adjustment. Moreover, the interaction effect of the group *time for RDOS has become significant nonlinearly (p = 0.037), but none of the interaction effects of the group *time were significant for RSBI (linear: p = 0.531; nonlinear: p = 0.272). Conclusion: These two methods finally reduced the patients' respiratory distress almost equally, but RSBI method can relieve the patients' respiratory distress faster than the VT and RR methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1030
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Predictive value of rapid shallow breathing index in relation to the weaning outcome in ICU patients
    Abu Youssef, Hoda A.
    Shalaby, Alaa Eldin O.
    Abd El Hafiz, Ahmed M.
    Shaban, Marwa M.
    Hamed, Hamed A. G.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEST DISEASES AND TUBERCULOSIS, 2016, 65 (02): : 465 - 472
  • [2] P0.1 IS A USEFUL PARAMETER IN SETTING THE LEVEL OF PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION
    ALBERTI, A
    GALLO, F
    FONGARO, A
    VALENTI, S
    ROSSI, A
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 21 (07) : 547 - 553
  • [3] Chest wall mechanics during pressure support ventilation
    Aliverti, Andrea
    Carlesso, Eleonora
    Dellaca, Raffaele
    Pelosi, Paolo
    Chiumello, Davide
    Pedotti, Antonio
    Gattinoni, Luciano
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (02):
  • [4] The patient needing prolonged mechanical ventilation: a narrative review
    Ambrosino, Nicolino
    Vitacca, Michele
    [J]. MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 13
  • [5] BREATHING FREQUENCY AND PATTERN ARE POOR PREDICTORS OF WORK OF BREATHING IN PATIENTS RECEIVING PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION
    BANNER, MJ
    KIRBY, RR
    KIRTON, OC
    DEHAVEN, CB
    BLANCH, PB
    [J]. CHEST, 1995, 108 (05) : 1338 - 1344
  • [6] Cairo JM, 2016, PILBEAMS MECH VENTIL, V6th
  • [7] Intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale
    Campbell, Margaret L.
    Templin, Thomas N.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (05) : 436 - 442
  • [8] A Respiratory Distress Observation Scale for Patients Unable To Self-Report Dyspnea
    Campbell, Margaret L.
    Templin, Thomas
    Walch, Julia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 13 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [9] Criner G, 2012, REV PORT PNEUMOL, V18, P214, DOI [10.1016/j.rppneu.2012.04.004, 10.1016/j.rppneu.2012.04.008]
  • [10] Desai JP, 2019, STATPEARLS INTERNET