A Survey on Centrality Metrics and Their Network Resilience Analysis

被引:43
|
作者
Wan, Zelin [1 ]
Mahajan, Yash [1 ]
Kang, Beom Woo [2 ]
Moore, Terrence J. [3 ]
Cho, Jin-Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[3] US Army Res Lab, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
关键词
Measurement; Resilience; Proteins; Social networking (online); Particle measurements; Atmospheric measurements; Communication networks; Centrality; networks; influence; importance; attacks; network resilience; network science; IDENTIFYING INFLUENTIAL NODES; ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; INFORMATION DIFFUSION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FOUNDER CENTRALITY; FAMILY FIRMS; ISNT ALWAYS; SPREADERS; RANKING;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3094196
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Centrality metrics have been studied in the network science research. They have been used in various networks, such as communication, social, biological, geographic, or contact networks under different disciplines. In particular, centrality metrics have been used in order to study and analyze targeted attack behaviors and investigated their effect on network resilience. Although a rich volume of centrality metrics has been developed from 1940s, only some centrality metrics (e.g., degree, betweenness, or cluster coefficient) have been commonly in use. This paper aims to introduce various existing centrality metrics and discusses their applicabilities in various networks. In addition, we conducted extensive simulation study in order to demonstrate and analyze the network resilience of targeted attacks using the surveyed centrality metrics under four real network topologies. We also discussed algorithmic complexity of centrality metrics surveyed in this work. Through the extensive experiments and discussions of the surveyed centrality metrics, we encourage their use in solving various computing and engineering problems in networks.
引用
收藏
页码:104773 / 104819
页数:47
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IoT energy efficiency through centrality metrics
    Alhaisoni M.
    Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, 2019, 3 (02): : 14 - 21
  • [42] Centrality Metrics in Dynamic Networks: A Comparison Study
    Ghanem, Marwan
    Magnien, Clemence
    Tarissan, Fabien
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 6 (04): : 940 - 951
  • [43] Centrality analysis of metro network, a case study of Paris
    Wang, Xi
    Zhan, Qingming
    Bonnin, Philippe
    Douady, Stephane
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION 2015, 2016, 30 : 179 - 182
  • [44] Survey of multistate network reliability and resilience evaluation methods
    Bai G.
    Zhang S.
    Zhang Y.
    Fang Y.
    Tao J.
    Zhongguo Kexue Jishu Kexue/Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2023, 53 (08): : 1284 - 1301
  • [45] Structure, Resilience and Evolution of the European Air Route Network From 2015 to 2018
    Esteve, Pau
    Ramasco, Jose J.
    Zanin, Massimiliano
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 10 (04): : 2045 - 2058
  • [46] A Survey of Social Network Analysis Techniques and their Applications to Socially Aware Networking
    Tsugawaya, Sho
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, E102B (01) : 17 - 39
  • [47] A Network Science Perspective of Graph Convolutional Networks: A Survey
    Jia, Mingshan
    Gabrys, Bogdan
    Musial, Katarzyna
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 39083 - 39122
  • [48] Evaluation and Improvement of Network Resilience against Attacks using Graph Spectral Metrics
    Alenazi, Mohammed J. F.
    Sterbenz, James P. G.
    2015 RESILIENCE WEEK (RSW), 2015, : 206 - 211
  • [49] SAM Centrality: a Hop-Based Centrality Measure for Ranking Users in Social Network
    Samad A.
    Qadir M.
    Nawaz I.
    Islam M.A.
    Aleem M.
    EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems, 2020, 7 (23) : 01 - 09
  • [50] Network centrality and mergers
    Baxamusa M.
    Javaid S.
    Harery K.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2015, 44 (3) : 393 - 423