Liver Tumor Classification Using Optimal Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimization

被引:2
|
作者
Jose, Reshma [1 ]
Chacko, Shanty [2 ]
Jayakumar, J. [2 ]
Jarin, T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Karunya Inst Technol & Sci, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Karunya Inst Technol & Sci, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Jyothi Engn Coll, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Trichur, Kerala, India
关键词
Image processing; liver cancer; deep belief network; feature extraction; classification; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; CT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1142/S0218001422400055
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Image processing plays a significant role in various fields like military, business, healthcare and science. Ultrasound (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) are the various image tests used in the treatment of the cancer. Detecting the liver tumor by these tests is a complex process. Hence, in this research work, a novel approach utilizing a deep learning model is used. That is Deep Belief Network (DBN) with Opposition-Based Learning (OBL)-Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) is used for the classification of liver cancer. This process undergoes five major processes. Initially, in pre-processing the color contrast is improved by Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) and the noise is removed by Wiener Filtering (WF). The liver is segmented by adaptive thresholding following pre-processing. Following that, the kernelizedFuzzy C Means (FCM) method is used to segment the tumor area. The form, color, and texture features are then extracted during the feature extraction process. Finally, these traits are categorized using DBN, and OBL-GWO is employed to enhance system performance. The entire evaluation is done on Liver Tumor Segmentation (LiTS) benchmark dataset. Finally, the performance of the proposed DBN-OBL-GWO is compared to other models and their achievements are proved. The proposed DBN-OBL-GWO achieves a better accuracy of 0.995, precision of 0.948 and false positive rate (FPR) of 0.116, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opposition-based learning grey wolf optimizer for global optimization
    Yu, Xiaobing
    Xu, WangYing
    Li, ChenLiang
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2021, 226
  • [2] A Novel Dynamic Generalized Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm
    Xing, Yanzhen
    Wang, Donghui
    Wang, Leiou
    ALGORITHMS, 2018, 11 (04)
  • [3] Reactive power planning by opposition-based grey wolf optimization method
    Raj, Saurav
    Bhattacharyya, Biplab
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2018, 28 (06):
  • [4] Optimized segmentation and classification for liver tumor segmentation and classification using opposition-based spotted hyena optimization
    Rela, Munipraveena
    Nagaraja Rao, Suryakari
    Ramana Reddy, Patil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 627 - 656
  • [5] A Random Opposition-Based Learning Grey Wolf Optimizer
    Long, Wen
    Jiao, Jianjun
    Liang, Ximing
    Cai, Shaohong
    Xu, Ming
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 113810 - 113825
  • [6] Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer Based on Opposition-Based Learning
    Gupta, Shubham
    Deep, Kusum
    SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING, 2019, 817 : 327 - 338
  • [7] Enhanced opposition-based grey wolf optimizer for global optimization and engineering design problems
    Chandran, Vanisree
    Mohapatra, Prabhujit
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 76 : 429 - 467
  • [8] Opposition-Based Multi-Tiered Grey Wolf Optimizer for Stochastic Global Optimization Paradigms
    Bahl, Vasudha
    Bhola, Anoop
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [9] Selective Opposition based Grey Wolf Optimization
    Dhargupta, Souvik
    Ghosh, Manosij
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    Sarkar, Ram
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 151
  • [10] An opposition-based chaotic Grey Wolf Optimizer for global optimisation tasks
    Gupta, Shubham
    Deep, Kusum
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 31 (05) : 751 - 779