Performance Assessment of Spatial Interpolation of Precipitation for Hydrological Process Simulation in the Three Gorges Basin

被引:39
作者
Cheng, Meiling [1 ]
Wang, Yonggui [1 ]
Engel, Bernard [2 ]
Zhang, Wanshun [1 ,3 ]
Peng, Hong [4 ]
Chen, Xiaomin [1 ]
Xia, Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Purdue Univ, Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Sch Water Resources & Hydropower, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
precipitation interpolation; runoff simulation; SWAT; the Three Gorges Basin; DAILY RAINFALL; RIVER-BASIN; SWAT; RADAR; MODEL; GAUGE; SOIL; VARIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; STREAMFLOW;
D O I
10.3390/w9110838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of spatial and temporal precipitation is crucial for simulating hydrological processes in basins, but is challenging due to insufficient rain gauges. Our study aims to analyze different precipitation interpolation schemes and their performances in runoff simulation during light and heavy rain periods. In particular, combinations of different interpolation estimates are explored and their performances in runoff simulation are discussed. The study was carried out in the Pengxi River basin of the Three Gorges Basin. Precipitation data from 16 rain gauges were interpolated using the Thiessen Polygon (TP), Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), and Co-Kriging (CK) methods. Results showed that streamflow predictions employing CK inputs demonstrated the best performance in the whole process, in terms of the Nash-Sutcliffe Coefficient (NSE), the coefficient of determination (R-2), and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) indices. The TP, IDW, and CK methods showed good performance in the heavy rain period but poor performance in the light rain period compared with the default method (least sophisticated nearest neighbor technique) in Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Furthermore, the correlation between the dynamic weight of one method and its performance during runoff simulation followed a parabolic function. The combination of CK and TP achieved a better performance in decreasing the largest and lowest absolute errors compared to any single method, but the IDW method outperformed all methods in terms of the median absolute error. However, it is clear from our findings that interpolation methods should be chosen depending on the amount of precipitation, adaptability of the method, and accuracy of the estimate in different rain periods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [31] Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review
    Li, Jin
    Heap, Andrew D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 53 : 173 - 189
  • [32] Ly S, 2013, BIOTECHNOL AGRON SOC, V17, P392
  • [33] Comparison of Rainfall Interpolation Methods in a Mountainous Region of a Tropical Island
    Mair, Alan
    Fares, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2011, 16 (04) : 371 - 383
  • [34] Assessing the Impact of Areal Precipitation Input on Streamflow Simulations Using the SWAT Model1
    Masih, Ilyas
    Maskey, Shreedhar
    Uhlenbrook, Stefan
    Smakhtin, Vladimir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2011, 47 (01): : 179 - 195
  • [35] Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations
    Moriasi, D. N.
    Arnold, J. G.
    Van Liew, M. W.
    Bingner, R. L.
    Harmel, R. D.
    Veith, T. L.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (03) : 885 - 900
  • [36] Improved combination of multiple atmospheric GCM ensembles for seasonal prediction
    Robertson, AW
    Lall, U
    Zebiak, SE
    Goddard, L
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2004, 132 (12) : 2732 - 2744
  • [37] Sensitivity of a lumped and semi-distributed hydrological model to several methods of rainfall interpolation on a large basin in West Africa
    Ruelland, D.
    Ardoin-Bardin, S.
    Billen, G.
    Servat, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 361 (1-2) : 96 - 117
  • [38] Salek M, 2000, PHYS CHEM EARTH PT B, V25, P977
  • [39] Transferability of SWAT Models between SWAT2009 and SWAT2012
    Seo, Mijin
    Yen, Haw
    Kim, Min-Kyeong
    Jeong, Jaehak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (03) : 869 - 880
  • [40] Impact of spatial rainfall variability on hydrology and nonpoint source pollution modeling
    Shen Zhenyao
    Chen Lei
    Liao Qian
    Liu Ruimin
    Hong Qian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 472 : 205 - 215