Smallest detectable difference in outcome variables related to painful restriction of the temporomandibular joint

被引:103
作者
Kropmans, TJB
Dijkstra, PU
Stegenga, B
Stewart, R
de Bont, LGM
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, No Ctr Human Hlth Care Res, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
therapeutic outcome; statistics; generalizability study; decision study; clinical decision; evidence-based medicine; reliability;
D O I
10.1177/00220345990780031101
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The smallest detectable difference is the smallest statistically significant change in measurement results. In the field of temporomandibular disorders, the smallest detectable difference is not a commonly used concept. Most outcome studies are based on comparisons of group means, although this does not provide information about individual changes or about the clinical relevance thereof. The smallest detectable difference for maximal mouth opening was calculated from previously published reliability coefficients and the standard deviations of different samples of healthy subjects and patients with complaints of the temporomandibular joint. The smallest detectable difference of pain intensity measured with different visual analogue scales was calculated from the reliability coefficients and standard deviations of a heterogeneous group of pain patients. The smallest detectable difference of function impairment was calculated for a group of patients with complaints of the temporomandibular joint. For maximal mouth opening in healthy subjects, the smallest detectable difference was 5 mm. Repeated measurements improved it to 3 mm. The smallest detectable difference on a visual analogue scale was 28 mm for actual pain intensity and 22 mm for minimal pain as well as for maximal pain intensity. For total function impairment of patients with complaints of the temporomandibular joint, the smallest detectable difference was 8 units on a 0 to 68 scale.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 789
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Brennan R.L., 1983, Elements of generalizability theory
[4]  
CARLSSON GE, 1980, SWED DENT J, V4, P187
[5]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLDS (PPT) IN THE TMJ CAPSULES BY ELECTRONIC ALGOMETER [J].
CHUNG, SC ;
KIM, JH ;
KIM, HS .
CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 1993, 11 (03) :171-176
[6]  
Cronbach JL, 1972, DEPENDABILITY BEHAV
[7]   PSYCHOMETRICS IN TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS - AN OVERVIEW [J].
DAHLSTROM, L .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 51 (06) :339-352
[8]   PATHOLOGY OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT AND OSTEOARTHROSIS [J].
DEBONT, LGM ;
STEGENGA, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 22 (02) :71-74
[9]   ANGLE OF MOUTH OPENING MEASUREMENT - RELIABILITY OF A TECHNIQUE FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT MOBILITY ASSESSMENT [J].
DIJKSTRA, PU ;
DEBONT, LGM ;
STEGENGA, B ;
BOERING, G .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1995, 22 (04) :263-268
[10]   ASSESSING CLINICAL SIGNS OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS - RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL EXAMINERS [J].
DWORKIN, SF ;
LERESCHE, L ;
DEROUEN, T ;
VONKORFF, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 63 (05) :574-579