Action research and millennials: Improving pedagogical approaches to encourage critical thinking

被引:19
作者
Erlam, Gwen [1 ]
Smythe, Liz [2 ]
Wright-St Clair, Valerie [2 ]
机构
[1] Unitec Inst Technol, 5-7 Ratanui St, Auckland 0612, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, 90 Akoranga Dr, Auckland 0627, New Zealand
关键词
Action research; Millennials; Inter-generational discourse; Undergraduate nursing; Simulation design; Pedagogical approaches; SIMULATION; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.023
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: This article examines the effects of intergenerational diversity on pedagogical practice in nursing education. While generational cohorts are not entirely homogenous, certain generational features do emerge. These features may require alternative approaches in educational design in order to maximize learning for millennial students. Method: Action research is employed with undergraduate millennial nursing students (n = 161) who are co-researchers in that they are asked for changes in current simulation environments which will improve their learning in the areas of knowledge acquisition, skill development, critical thinking, and communication. These changes are put into place and a re-evaluation of the effectiveness of simulation progresses through three action cycles. Results: Millennials, due to a tendency for risk aversion, may gravitate towards more supportive learning environments which allow for free access to educators. This tendency is mitigated by the educator modeling expected behaviors, followed by student opportunity to repeat the behavior. Millennials tend to prefer to work in teams, see tangible improvement, and employ strategies to improve inter-professional communication. Conclusion: This research highlights the need for nurse educators working in simulation to engage in critical discourse regarding the adequacy and effectiveness of current pedagogy informing simulation design. Pedagogical approaches which maximize repetition, modeling, immersive feedback, and effective communication tend to be favored by millennial students.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 145
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Assessing the Reliability, Validity, and Use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: Three Approaches
    Adamson, Katie Anne
    Gubrud, Paula
    Sideras, Stephanie
    Lasater, Kathie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (02) : 66 - 73
  • [2] Instructional design dogma: Creating planned learning experiences in simulation
    Anderson, JoDee M.
    Aylor, Megan E.
    Leonard, Douglas T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 23 (04) : 595 - 602
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], MILLENNIAL RULES CON
  • [5] Benner P., 2010, Educating nurses. A call for radical transformation
  • [6] Differences in motives between Millennial and Generation X medical students
    Borges, Nicole J.
    Manuel, R. Stephen
    Elam, Carol L.
    Jones, Bonnie J.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (06) : 570 - 576
  • [7] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
  • [8] Brown P, 2011, NUCL ENG INT, V56, P42
  • [9] Creswell J. W., 2011, DESIGNING CONDUCTING
  • [10] Effectiveness of Integrated Simulation and Clinical Experiences Compared to Traditional Clinical Experiences for Nursing Students
    Curl, Eileen D.
    Smith, Sheila
    Chisholm, Le Ann
    McGee, Leah Anne
    Das, Kumar
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 37 (02) : 72 - 77