Tolerance to soil acidity of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under field conditions Southwestern Ethiopia

被引:1
|
作者
Bedassa, Tolossa Ameyu [1 ,2 ]
Abebe, Abush Tesfaye [3 ]
Tolessa, Alemayehu Regassa [4 ]
机构
[1] Jimma Agr Res Ctr, Jimma, Ethiopia
[2] Ethiopian Inst Agr Res, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr, Ibadan, Nigeria
[4] Jimma Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management, Jimma, Ethiopia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
LOW PH; ALUMINUM; CALCIUM; GROWTH; LIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0272924
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Soil acidity with associated low nutrient availability is one of the major constraints to soybean production in southwestern Ethiopia. Integrated use of lime and acid-tolerant crops is believed to reduce soil acidity and improve crop production. The experiment was conducted in the field condition of Mettu, southwestern Ethiopia during the 2017/18 main cropping season. The experiment comprised fifteen soybean genotypes and two soil amendment (lime and unlimed) treatments arranged in a split-plot design with three replications. For each treatment, four rows were planted per plot; data related to growth, root, nodule, and yield of the crop were collected at a necessary stage for each. Liming and genotype interaction had significantly (P= 0.01) affected all parameters considered except for hundred seed weight and root volume and were affected only by the main effects of genotypes and liming. A significant reduction for most parameters was found on lime-untreated soil than treated soil. Though some genotypes showed higher performance for root, growth parameters, and yield components under unlimed soils; however, gave higher yield and yield components, when grown on lime-untreated with an average yield reduction of 13.7%, due to soil acidity. The maximum grain yield of (1943.93 kg ha(-1)) was obtained under lime treated acid soil from P1567046A genotype; while the lowest (510.49 kg ha(-1)) were recorded from SCS-1genotype under the lime untreated acid soil. Genotype BRS268 showed higher yield (1319.83 kg ha(-1)) under lime untreated acid soil than lime treated acid soil (1143.47 kg ha(-1)) and showed less reduction percentage for a number of the nodules, root weight, and number of seeds per plant; while P1567046A showed high reduction percentage for yield, biomass, number of pod and seed per plant. A high difference was observed among the soybean genotypes for soil acidity tolerance, which might be further exploited by breeders for the genetic improvement of soybean. Genotype BRS268 had performed better than other tested genotypes under increased soil acidity. selection would be effective to improve soybean genotypes performance on acid soils and identify low Phosphorus tolerant genotype that helps smallholder farmers optimize soybean productivity on acid soils in the study area. HAWASSA-04 variety is the most tolerant among the tested materials. However, further study is required by considering additional genotypes to reach a conclusive recommendation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptability and stability of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes in semiarid conditions
    José Ricardo Tavares de Albuquerque
    Hamurábi Anizio Lins
    Manoel Galdino dos Santos
    Márcio Alexandre Moreira de Freitas
    Fernando Sarmento de Oliveira
    Almir Rogério Evangelista de Souza
    Lindomar Maria da Silveira
    Glauber Henrique de Sousa Nunes
    Aurélio Paes Barros Júnior
    Paulo Fernando de Melo Jorge Vieira
    Euphytica, 2022, 218
  • [2] Adaptability and stability of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes in semiarid conditions
    Tavares de Albuquerque, Jose Ricardo
    Lins, Hamurabi Anizio
    dos Santos, Manoel Galdino
    Moreira de Freitas, Marcio Alexandre
    de Oliveira, Fernando Sarmento
    Evangelista de Souza, Almir Rogerio
    da Silveira, Lindomar Maria
    de Sousa Nunes, Glauber Henrique
    Barros Junior, Aurelio Paes
    de Melo Jorge Vieira, Paulo Fernando
    EUPHYTICA, 2022, 218 (05)
  • [3] Assessment of genetic divergence in salt tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes
    M. A. Mannan
    M. A. Karim
    Q. A. Khaliq
    M. M. Haque
    M. A. K. Mian
    J. U. Ahmed
    Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2010, 13 (1) : 33 - 37
  • [4] Stability analysis and nutritional quality of soybean ( Glycine max (L) .Merrill .) genotypes for feed in southwestern Ethiopia
    Mossie, Tesfa
    Biratu, Kasa
    Yifred, Helina
    Silesh, Yechalew
    Tesfaye, Abush
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [5] Evaluation of Flooding Tolerance of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) in Greenhouse under Upland and Paddy Soil Conditions
    Dhungana S.K.
    Kim H.-S.
    Kang B.-K.
    Seo J.-H.
    Kim H.-T.
    Shin S.-O.
    Park C.-H.
    Kwak D.-Y.
    Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2019, 22 (3) : 283 - 290
  • [6] Diallel analysis of soybean (Glycine max L.) for biomass yield and root characteristics under low phosphorus soil conditions in Western Ethiopia
    Abebe, Abush Tesfaye
    Adewale, Samuel
    Chigeza, Godfree
    Derera, John
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [7] EMERGENCE AND GROWTH OF 2 NONNODULATED SOYBEAN GENOTYPES (GLYCINE-MAX (L) MERR) IN RESPONSE TO SOIL ACIDITY
    RITCHEY, KD
    CARTER, TE
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1993, 151 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [8] GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERR.) GENOTYPES UNDER SHADING
    Wahyuningsih, S.
    Sundari, T.
    Sutrisno
    Harnowo, D.
    Harsono, A.
    Soehendi, R.
    Mejaya, M. J.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 19 (05): : 3377 - 3392
  • [9] Genetic Parameters of Soybean [Glycine max (L.)] Genotypes Tolerant to Salinity
    Putri, Pratanti H.
    Susanto, Gatut W. A.
    Sundari, Titik
    Soehendi, Rudy
    Trustinah
    Indriani, Febria C.
    Wahyuni, Tinuk S.
    Mejaya, Made J.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (06) : 695 - 699
  • [10] Performance of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Cultivars under Irrigated and Rainfed Conditions
    Csajbok, Jozsef
    Kutasy, Erika Tunde
    Melash, Anteneh Agezew
    Virag, Istvan Csaba
    Abraham, Eva Babett
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (05) : 594 - 600