The carbon footprint of the operating room related to infection prevention measures: a scoping review

被引:26
作者
Bolten, A. [1 ]
Kringos, D. S. [1 ,2 ]
Spijkerman, I. J. B. [3 ]
Weiland, N. H. Sperna [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Qual Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Microbiol & Infect Prevent, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Anaesthesiol, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Sustainable Healthcare, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Ctr Sustainable Healthcare, Dept Anaesthesiol, Amsterdam UMC, POB 22660,Room H1-125, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Surgical site infections; Operating rooms; Carbon footprint; Sustainable development; Disposable equipment; Equipment reuse; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LAMINAR AIR-FLOW; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL-SUSTAINABILITY; THEATER VENTILATION; CATARACT-SURGERY; REDUCING COST; SYSTEMS; ANESTHESIA; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Infection prevention measures are widely used in operating rooms (ORs). However, the extent to which they are at odds with ambitions to reduce the health sec-tor's carbon footprint remains unclear.Aim: To synthesize the evidence base for the carbon footprint of commonly used infection prevention measures in the OR, namely medical devices and instruments, surgical attire and air treatment systems. Methods: A scoping review of the international scientific literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles published between 2010 and June 2021 on infection prevention measures, their impact on the health sector's carbon footprint, and risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) were included.Findings: Although hospitals strive to reduce their carbon footprint, many infection prevention measures result in increased emissions. Evidence suggests that the use of disposable items instead of reusable items generally increases the carbon footprint, depending on sources of electricity. Controversy exists regarding the correlation between air treatment systems, contamination and the incidence of SSIs. The literature indicates that new air treatment systems consume more energy and do not necessarily reduce SSIs compared with conventional systems.Conclusion: Infection prevention measures in ORs can be at odds with sustainability. The use of new air treatment systems and disposable items generally leads to significant greenhouse gas emissions, and does not necessarily reduce the incidence of SSIs. Alter-native infection prevention measures with less environmental impact are available. Implementation could be facilitated by embracing environmental impact as an additional dimension of quality of care, which should change current risk-based approaches for the prevention of SSIs.(c) 2022 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 73
页数:10
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Operating theatre ventilation systems and microbial air contamination in total joint replacement surgery: results of the GISIO-ISChIA study
    Agodi, A.
    Auxilia, F.
    Barchitta, M.
    Cristina, M. L.
    D'Alessandro, D.
    Mura, I.
    Nobile, M.
    Pasquarella, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2015, 90 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [2] Temperature-controlled airflow ventilation in operating rooms compared with laminar airflow and turbulent mixed airflow
    Alsved, M.
    Civilis, A.
    Ekolind, P.
    Tammelin, A.
    Andersson, A. Erichsen
    Jakobsson, J.
    Svensson, T.
    Ramstorp, M.
    Sadrizadeh, S.
    Larsson, P-A.
    Bohgard, M.
    Santl-Temkiv, T.
    Londahl, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2018, 98 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [3] Comparison between mixed and laminar airflow systems in operating rooms and the influence of human factors: Experiences from a Swedish orthopedic center
    Andersson, Annette Erichsen
    Petzold, Max
    Bergh, Ingrid
    Karlsson, Jon
    Eriksson, Bengt I.
    Nilsson, Kerstin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2014, 42 (06) : 665 - 669
  • [4] Arksey H., 2005, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • [5] Association for Perioperative Practice, 2022, STAND REC, V5th
  • [6] Axelrod D., 2017, GREENING OPERATING R
  • [7] Managing barriers to recycling in the operating room
    Azouz, Solomon
    Boyll, Piper
    Swanson, Marco
    Castel, Nikki
    Maffi, Terry
    Rebecca, Alanna M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 217 (04) : 634 - 638
  • [8] Barker K, 2019, WE NEED TALK
  • [9] Initiatives to broaden safety concerns in anaesthetic practice: The green operating room
    Beloeil, Helene
    Albaladejo, Pierre
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017
    Berrios, Sandra I.
    Umscheid, Craig A.
    Bratzler, Dale W.
    Leas, Brian
    Stone, Erin C.
    Kelz, Rachel R.
    Reinke, Caroline E.
    Morgan, Sherry
    Solomkin, Joseph S.
    Mazuski, John E.
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    Berbari, Elie F.
    Segreti, John
    Parvizi, Javad
    Blanchard, Joan
    Allen, George
    Kluytmans, Jan A. J. W.
    Donlan, Rodney
    Schecter, William P.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (08) : 784 - 791