Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: development of Indian population-based models

被引:6
作者
Hiwale, Sujitkumar [1 ]
Misra, Hemant [1 ,2 ]
Ulman, Shrutin [1 ]
机构
[1] Philips Res India, Philips Innovat Campus, Bengaluru 560045, Karnataka, India
[2] IBM Res, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Ultrasonography; prenatal; Fetal weight; India; Regression analysis; Models; statistical; SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION; REGRESSION; GROWTH; PREDICTION; SELECTION; PATTERNS; COHORT; BIRTH; HEAD;
D O I
10.14366/usg.18004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Existing ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation models have been shown to have high errors when used in the Indian population. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop Indian population-based models for fetal weight estimation, and the secondary objective was to compare their performance against established models. Methods: Retrospectively collected data from 173 cases were used in this study. The inclusion criteria were a live singleton pregnancy and an interval from the ultrasound scan to delivery of >= 7 days. Multiple stepwise regression (MSR) and lasso regression methods were used to derive fetal weight estimation models using a randomly selected training group (n=137) with cross-products of abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), and femur length (FL) as independent variables. In the validation group (n=36), the bootstrap method was used to compare the performance of the new models against 12 existing models. Results: The equations for the best-fit models obtained using the MSR and lasso methods were as follows: log(10)(EFW)=2.7843700+0.0004197(HCxAC)+0.0008545(ACxFL) and log(10)(EFW)=2.38 70211110+0.0074323216(HC)+0.0186555940(AC)+0.0013463735(BPD x FL)+0.0004519715 (HCxFL), respectively. In the training group, both models had very low systematic errors of 0.01% (+/- 7.74%) and -0.03% (+/- 7.70%), respectively. In the validation group, the performance of these models was found to be significantly better than that of the existing models. Conclusion: The models presented in this study were found to be superior to existing models of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation in the Indian population. We recommend a thorough evaluation of these models in independent studies.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, J ROYAL STAT SOC B
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, QUIRY
[4]  
COMBS CA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P365
[5]   A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight [J].
Dudley, NJ .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (01) :80-89
[6]  
Efron B., 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap, V1st ed.
[7]   Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent [J].
Friedman, Jerome ;
Hastie, Trevor ;
Tibshirani, Rob .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2010, 33 (01) :1-22
[8]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
SHARMAN, RS ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) :333-337
[9]   SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT - THE VALUE OF FEMUR LENGTH IN ADDITION TO HEAD AND ABDOMEN MEASUREMENTS [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
CARPENTER, RJ ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 150 (02) :535-540
[10]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT FROM ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF TRUNK CIRCUMFERENCE [J].
HIGGINBOTTOM, J ;
SLATER, J ;
PORTER, G ;
WHITFIELD, CR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09) :698-701