Religious orientations as a predictor of rational thinking among secondary school students

被引:7
作者
Buzdar, Muhammad Ayub [1 ]
Ali, Akhtar [2 ]
Tariq, Riaz Ul Haq [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Coll Univ Faisalabad, Dept Educ, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[2] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur, Dept Educ, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
关键词
Adolescents; Cognition; Reasoning; Religiosity; Mental process; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY; STYLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2014.11.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Cognitive experiential self-theory (CEST) postulates that past experiences develop implicit beliefs in human cognitive system. These beliefs modify and generate schemas attaching meanings to self, others and relations between self and others. Allport's religious orientations are explanations of people religious beliefs focusing the reasons of their religiousness. We, in the current study investigated the contribution of secondary school students' religious affiliations (fellowship with Hinduism, Christianity or Islam) as well as religious orientations (intrinsic, extrinsic personal and extrinsic social) in developing their cognitive experiential thinking systems. The Hindu (N= 1050), Christian (N= 1073), and Muslim (N= 1394) secondary school students participated in the study. Age universal I-E (intrinsic-extrinsic religiosity) scale and rational experiential inventory for adolescents (REI-A) were adapted to collect the required information. We conclude that the students' religious affiliations and orientations have significant impacts on their cognitive systems, specifically on rational thinking rather than on experiential thinking. The religious orientations moderately explain the variances in rational thinking of Hindu and Muslim students, while their impact on the rational choices of the Christian students is very small. In general, both an intrinsic orientation to religion and an external personal orientation are positively associated with rational thinking, while an external social orientation is negatively associated. Religious affiliations and orientations have very little effect on experiential thinking. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Aarnio K., 2007, J INDIVID DIFFER, V28, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1, 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1]
[2]  
Allport G.W., 1963, J RELIG HEALTH, V2, P187, DOI [10.1007/BF01533333, DOI 10.1007/BF01533333, 10.1007/bf01533333]
[3]  
Allport G.W., 1960, The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation
[4]  
Allport Gordon W., 1961, Pattern and Growth in Personality
[5]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[6]   Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles [J].
Epstein, S ;
Pacini, R ;
DenesRaj, V ;
Heier, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :390-405
[7]   INTEGRATION OF THE COGNITIVE AND THE PSYCHODYNAMIC UNCONSCIOUS [J].
EPSTEIN, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (08) :709-724
[8]  
Epstein S., 2003, COMPREHENSIVE HDB PS, V5, P159, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0507
[9]   Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition [J].
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 59 :255-278
[10]   Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate [J].
Evans, Jonathan St B. T. ;
Stanovich, Keith E. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (03) :223-241