Impact of Corporate Political Activity on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach

被引:37
作者
Lin, Woon Leong [1 ]
Ho, Jo Ann [1 ]
Sambasivan, Murali [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Econ & Management, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Taylors Univ, Lakeside Campus, Selangor 47500, Malaysia
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
corporate political activity; corporate social responsibility; corporate financial performance; stakeholder theory; system GMM; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; FIRM SIZE; BUSINESS; CSR; STRATEGY; RISK; CONNECTIONS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/su11010060
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As corporate social responsibility (CSR) gains momentum in the business world, it is imperative to comprehend the relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP). While there is prior research looking at this relationship, scholars have proposed a contingency view that is meant to determine the situational contexts in which critical associations between CFP and CSR activities will arise. This study provides further insight into the moderating effects of corporate political activity, specifying the ways in which different arrangements of corporate CSR and CPA might align or otherwise, thus influencing CFP beyond associated dissimilar effects on corporate performance. The data for this study was obtained for the periods 2007-2016 from the samples selected from the list of Fortune's World's Most Admired Companies. The dynamic panel data was analyzed using the System Generalized Method of Moment estimation. The main findings are that CSR does not significantly influence CFP. However, CPA does negatively moderate the relationship between CSR and CFP. This indicates that high political expenditures worsen a firm's financial position compared to the financial position of firms with less spending on CPA.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   Causal effect of analyst following on corporate social responsibility [J].
Adhikari, Binay K. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 41 :201-216
[2]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[3]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, DOI 10.2307/2348581
[4]  
Alafi K., 2012, INT J HUMANITIES SOC, V2, P102
[5]   Corporate Dystopia: The Ethics of Corporate Political Spending [J].
Alzola, Miguel .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2013, 52 (03) :388-426
[6]  
Anderson D.R., 2005, Statistics for business and economics, V9th
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MODGRAPH I PROGRAMME
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ECON PAPERS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J BUS ETHICS, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10551-015-2658-5, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2658-5]
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1984, STAKEHOLDER MANAGEME