Evaluation of VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix for identification of clinical isolates and reference strains

被引：36

作者：

Jin, Won-Young ^{[1
]}

Jang, Sook-Jin ^{[1
,2
]}

Lee, Min-Jung ^{[2
]}

Park, Geon ^{[1
]}

Kim, Min-Jung ^{[3
]}

Kook, Joong-Ki ^{[3
]}

Kim, Dong-Min ^{[4
]}

Moon, Dae-Soo ^{[1
]}

Park, Young-Jin ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Chosun Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Kwangju, South Korea

[2] Chosun Univ, Sch Med, Res Ctr Resistant Cells, Kwangju, South Korea

[3] Chosun Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral Biochem, Kwangju, South Korea

[4] Chosun Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Kwangju, South Korea

来源：

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE | 2011年 / 70卷 / 04期

关键词：

Bacteria; Identification; Equipment; Evaluation studies; Task performance and analysis; SYSTEM; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; WALKAWAY; BACILLI; RODS; CARD;

D O I：

10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.04.013

中图分类号：

R51 [传染病];

学科分类号：

100401 ;

摘要：

To compare the identification accuracies of VITEK 2 (bioMerieux), MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare), and Phoenix (Becton Dickinson), microbial identification was performed on 160 clinical isolates and 50 reference strains on each of these 3 systems, using the appropriate identification kit provided by each system. Of the 142 clinical isolates that were identified at the species level, VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix correctly identified 93.7%, 82.4%, and 93.0%, and incorrectly identified 2.1%, 7.0%, and 0%, respectively. In the reference strain tests, VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix correctly identified 55.3%, 54.4%, and 78.0% of the reference strains at the species level and incorrectly identified 10.6%, 13.0%, and 6.0% of the reference strains, respectively. In conclusion, the identification rate of VITEK 2, Phoenix, and MicroScan was high or acceptable on clinical isolates. Phoenix showed a significantly higher performance than VITEK 2 or MicroScan in identifying the reference strains. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：442 / 447

页数：6

共 15 条

[1] 16S rRNA gene sequencing versus the API 20 NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory
Bosshard, PP
Zbinden, R
Abels, S
Böddinghaus, B
Altwegg, M
Böttger, EC
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (04) : 1359 - 1366
[2] Evaluation of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae
Carroll, Karen C.
Glanz, Brian D.
Borek, Anita P.
Burger, Chad
Bhally, Hasan S.
Henciak, Susan
Flayhart, Diane
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (10) : 3506 - 3509
[3] Evaluation of the automated phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory
Donay, JL
Mathieu, D
Fernandes, P
Prégermain, C
Bruel, P
Wargnier, A
Casin, I
Weill, FX
Lagrange, PH
Herrmann, JL
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (04) : 1542 - 1546
[4] Analysis of the comparative workflow and performance characteristics of the VITEK 2 and Phoenix systems
Eigner, U
Schmid, A
Wild, U
Bertsch, D
Fahr, AM
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (08) : 3829 - 3834
[5] Comparison of the phenotyping methods ID 32E and VITEK 2 compact GN with 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the identification of Enterobacter sakazakii
Fanjat, Nadege
Leclercq, Alexandre
Joosten, Han
Robichon, Denis
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (06) : 2048 - 2050
[6] Evaluation of an automated system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacilli
Jossart, MF
Courcol, RJ
[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 18 (12) : 902 - 907
[7] Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for the identification and susceptibility testing of three species of nonfermenting gram-negative rods frequently isolated from clinical samples
Joyanes, P
Conejo, MD
Martínez-Martínez, L
Perea, EJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (09) : 3247 - 3253
[8] Distinct antimicrobial resistance patterns and antimicrobial resistance-harboring genes according to genomic species of Acinetobacter isolates
Lim, Yu Mi
Shin, Kyeong Seob
Kim, Jungmin
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (03) : 902 - 905
[9] Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures
Ling, TKW
Liu, ZK
Cheng, AFB
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (10) : 4705 - 4707
[10] Comparison of 16S rRNA sequencing with conventional and commercial phenotypic techniques for identification of enterococci from the marine environment
Moore, D. F.
Zhowandai, M. H.
Ferguson, D. M.
Mcgee, C.
Mott, J. B.
Stewart, J. C.
[J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 100 (06) : 1272 - 1281

← 1 2 →