Rolling covenants to protect coastal ecosystems in the face of sea-level rise

被引:14
作者
Bell-James, Justine [1 ,2 ]
Fitzsimons, James A. [3 ,4 ]
Gillies, Chris L. [3 ,5 ]
Shumway, Nicole [2 ,6 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, TC Beirne Sch Law, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Nat Conservancy Australia, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, TropWATER, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Ctr Policy Futures, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
covenants; coastal ecosystems; coastal squeeze; sea level rise; rolling covenants; wetlands; CONSERVATION COVENANTS; SALT-MARSH; MANGROVE; STATE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/csp2.593
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This article considers how "rolling covenants" (i.e., covenants on land title that can operate in a "rolling" geographic area to keep pace with sea-level rise) can be used to permit productive use of land in the short term, while ensuring land use can shift over time to allow for coastal ecosystem migration in the medium to long term. We use Australia as a case study, and through analysis of legislation and a series of semistructured interviews, we demonstrate how land title-based covenants can be used to give legal effect to "rolling covenant" arrangements where land is subject to existing use and occupation. We then consider practical issues associated with drafting a rolling covenant arrangement, including an analysis of the types of events or scenarios that could be used as a basis for land use changing (e.g., projected sea-level rise, actual ecosystem migration), and the advantages and disadvantages of each. We conclude that rolling covenants are a viable option for land management in the coastal zone, especially in circumstances where funding sources are available to incentivize uptake. Rolling covenants may provide opportunities for coastal wetlands to be maintained and even enhanced in cover, thereby delivering important ecosystem services (e.g., blue carbon) into the future.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE COAST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ECOL MANAG RESTOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CONSERV LETT, DOI DOI 10.1111/conl.12213
[4]   Do conservation covenants consider the delivery of ecosystem services? [J].
Archibald, Carla L. ;
Dade, Marie C. ;
Sonter, Laura J. ;
Bell-James, Justine ;
Boldy, Robyn ;
Cano, Beatriz ;
Friedman, Rachel S. ;
Siqueira, Flavia Freire ;
Metzger, Jean Paul ;
Fitzsimons, James A. ;
Rhodes, Jonathan R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 115 :99-107
[5]   Differences among protected area governance types matter for conserving vegetation communities at-risk of loss and fragmentation [J].
Archibald, Carla L. ;
Barnes, Megan D. ;
Tulloch, Ayesha I. T. ;
Fitzsimons, James A. ;
Morrison, Tiffany H. ;
Mills, Morena ;
Rhodes, Jonathan R. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 247
[6]  
Bell-James J., 2019, AUSTR PROPERTY LAW J, V27, P114, DOI DOI 10.3316/AGISPT.20190319007797
[7]  
Beumer, 2000, FISHERIES GUIDELINES
[8]  
Bindoff N. L., 2019, IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, P447
[9]  
Bingham H., 2017, PARKS, V23, P13, DOI [10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-1HB.en, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-1HB.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-231HB.en, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-231HB.EN]
[10]   Privately Protected Areas: Missing Pieces of the Global Conservation Puzzle [J].
Bingham, Heather C. ;
Fitzsimons, James A. ;
Mitchell, Brent A. ;
Redford, Kent H. ;
Stolton, Sue .
FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2021, 2