Landscape Influence on Dispersal of Yearling Male White-Tailed Deer

被引:13
作者
Peterson, Brittany E. [1 ]
Storm, Daniel J. [2 ]
Norton, Andrew S. [3 ]
Van Deelen, Timothy R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Wisconsin Dept Nat Resources, Bur Sci Serv, 107 Sutliff Ave, Rhinelander, WI 54501 USA
[3] Minnesota Dept Nat Resources, Wildlife Res, 35365 800th Ave, Madelia, MN 56062 USA
关键词
barriers; disease spread; dispersal direction; dispersal distance; forest cover; landscape; white-tailed deer; Wisconsin; ODOCOILEUS-VIRGINIANUS; HOME-RANGE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; POPULATION; EXCURSIONS; PROXIMATE; MORTALITY; DISTANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.21318
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Landscape features can alter the transfer phase of dispersal and dispersal-mediated disease transmission and gene flow. The transfer phase is poorly understood, but improved understanding of landscape effects on dispersal distance and direction would allow better prediction and mitigation of disease spread and improved delineation of management zones. To investigate how ecological settings influence dispersal in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), we captured and radio-collared 409 juvenile male deer from 2 study areas in Wisconsin, USA, one dominated by public forest and another by row-crop agriculture. Dispersal directions were non-directed in the heavily forested study area, but there was a southeastern bias in the farmland study area. Individual dispersal distances were not related to forest cover, and study area average and maximum distances differed from expected, based on published relationships between forest cover and population-average dispersal distance. Roads, rivers, and cities were semipermeable barriers to dispersal, but effects of barriers differed with respect to study area, suggesting that natural and anthropogenic features influence dispersal-mediated disease transmission and gene flow. Our results suggest that dispersal models should consider movement barriers in more developed landscapes, and barriers can also be used to inform designation of biologically meaningful management units. (C) 2017 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1449 / 1456
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Andreassen HP, 2002, DISPERSAL ECOLOGY, P237
[2]   A MODEL FOR THE SPREAD OF BOVINE TB IN NEW-ZEALAND POSSUM POPULATIONS [J].
BARLOW, ND .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1993, 30 (01) :156-164
[3]  
Batschelet E., 1981, Circular statistics in biology, DOI DOI 10.2307/1267831
[4]   Effect of vegetation matrix on animal dispersal: Genetic evidence from a study of endangered skinks [J].
Berry, O ;
Tocher, MD ;
Gleeson, DM ;
Sarre, SD .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) :855-864
[5]  
Brinkman TJ, 2005, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V69, P1099, DOI 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1099:MOFWDE]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
CLOVER MELVIN R., 1956, CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME, V42, P199
[8]   Condition-dependent natal dispersal in a large herbivore: heavier animals show a greater propensity to disperse and travel further [J].
Debeffe, Lucie ;
Morellet, Nicolas ;
Cargnelutti, Bruno ;
Lourtet, Bruno ;
Bon, Richard ;
Gaillard, Jean-Michel ;
Hewison, A. J. Mark .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 81 (06) :1327-1327
[9]  
Dhuey B., 2014, WISCONSIN BIG GAME H
[10]   Modeling distribution of dispersal distances in male white-tailed deer [J].
Diefenbach, Duane R. ;
Long, Eric S. ;
Rosenberry, Christopher S. ;
Wallingford, Bret D. ;
Smith, David R. .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 72 (06) :1296-1303