The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

被引:162
作者
Shabana, Kareem M. [1 ]
Buchholtz, Ann K. [2 ]
Carroll, Archie B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Connecticut State Univ, Sch Business, Management, New Britain, CT 06050 USA
[2] Rutgers Business Sch Newark & New Brunswick, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting; sustainability reporting; institutional theory; isomorphism; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; DISCLOSURE; MEDIATION; FIRM; DETERMINANTS; ISOMORPHISM; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; SIZE; CEOS;
D O I
10.1177/0007650316628177
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article presents a three-stage model of how isomorphic mechanisms have shaped corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting practices over time. In the first stage, defensive reporting, companies fail to meet stakeholder expectations due to a deficiency in firm performance. In this stage, the decision to report is driven by coercive isomorphism as firms sense pressure to close the expectational gap. In the second stage, proactive reporting, knowledge of CSR reporting spreads and the practice of CSR reporting becomes normatively sanctioned. In this stage, normative isomorphism leads other organizations to look to CSR reporting as a potential new opportunity for achieving the firm's goals. In the third stage, imitative diffusion, the defensive reporters together with the proactive reporters create a critical mass of CSR reporters that reaches a threshold at which the benefits of CSR reporting begin to outweigh any costs due to mimetic isomorphism. The study finds support for the model in an examination of Fortune 500 firms from 1997 to 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1135
页数:29
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Åberg Y, 2000, ACTA SOCIOL, V43, P193
[2]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[3]   The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving [J].
Amato, Louis H. ;
Amato, Christie H. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 72 (03) :229-241
[4]  
Andras TrinaLarsen., 2003, International Journal of Business and Economics, V2, P167
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Accounting and Business Research, DOI DOI 10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, DOI [10.1108/09513579610109987, DOI 10.1108/09513579610109987]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ACAD, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMBPP.1997.4989394
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011
[9]  
[Anonymous], J ENV MANAG
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference