Technology review and data analysis for cost assessment of water treatment systems

被引:139
作者
Bhojwani, Sumay [1 ]
Topolski, Kevin [1 ]
Mukherjee, Rajib [2 ]
Sengupta, Debalina [2 ]
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Engn Expt Stn, Gas & Fuels Res Ctr, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Water treatment; Desalination cost; Energy consumption; Environmental impact; THERMAL MEMBRANE DISTILLATION; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; DESALINATION PLANTS; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; POWERED DESALINATION; WASTE INTERCEPTION; NETWORKS; ENERGY; REUSE; MSF;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.363
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A wide variety of water sources, treatment methods, and recycling options have created amyriad of water management options. For modeling of sustainablewater treatment options, computationally efficientmodelsmay be required. This paper provides a comprehensive and comparative review of the water management systems and the associated economic, environmental, and performance metrics. The water management systems are represented as a network of sources, users, technologies, recycling options, and quality of water. Special attention is given to desalination systems. The two main technology categories currently used for desalination are thermal (e.g., Multistage Flash "MSF", Multi-Effect Distillation "MED", and Mechanical Vapor Compression "MVC") and membrane (e.g., seawater reverse osmosis "SWRO", brackish water reverse osmosis "BWRO"). The cost assessment includes a capital cost comparison (for which regression analysis has been used to account for the nonlinear nature of the capacity-cost curves), an operating cost comparison, which includes energy requirements, labor costs, chemicals used, maintenance and repair costs, membrane replacement costs and a unit product cost ($/m(3)) breakdown, which combines the capital and operating costs. Numerous data were collected for the cost of desalination systems. Statistical methods were then used to analyze these collected data to establish deeper understanding of the relationship to capital cost, operating cost, capacity, constraints due to treatment method capabilities, requirements of the users. The paper also briefly discusses other cost considerations such as the water intake and distribution costs. The environmental impacts (concentrate disposal and CO2 footprint) have also been compared for the various technologies considered. Some integration strategies such as use of hybrid systems, cogeneration plants and use of renewable energy have shown reductions in cost associated due to energy consumption and thereby, reducing the unit product cost. Finally, the paper provides a selection guide suitable for various situations with consideration of the different factors affecting cost, environmental impact and energy demands. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2749 / 2761
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Systemic approach for techno-economic evaluation of triple hybrid (RO, MSF and power generation) scheme including accounting of CO2 emission [J].
Agashichev, SP ;
El-Nashar, AM .
ENERGY, 2005, 30 (08) :1283-1303
[2]   Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes [J].
Al-Karaghouli, Ali ;
Kazmerski, Lawrence L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 :343-356
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WHITE PAPER DESCRIBI
[4]  
Awerbuch Leon, 2004, C P
[5]   Optimization of multi-effect distillation with brine treatment via membrane distillation and process heat integration [J].
Bamufleh, Hisham ;
Abdelhady, Faissal ;
Baageel, Hassan M. ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. .
DESALINATION, 2017, 408 :110-118
[6]  
Bay Area Regional Desalination Project, 2007, APP COST EV
[7]   The real cost of desalted water and how to reduce it further [J].
Blank, J. E. ;
Tusel, G. F. ;
Nisan, S. .
DESALINATION, 2007, 205 (1-3) :298-311
[8]   Fundamentals and costing of MSF desalination plants and comparison with other technologies [J].
Borsani, R ;
Rebagliati, S .
DESALINATION, 2005, 182 (1-3) :29-37
[9]  
CADENA F, 1988, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V60, P1259
[10]  
Chang Joseph, INDICATIVE CHEM PRIC