On-demand versus half-dose continuous therapy with esomeprazole for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease A randomized comparative study

被引:6
作者
Cho, Joon Hyun [1 ]
Koo, Ji Yeon [1 ]
Kim, Kyeong Ok [1 ]
Lee, Si Hyung [1 ]
Jang, Byung Ik [1 ]
Kim, Tae Nyeun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 170 Hyeonchung Ro, Daegu 42415, South Korea
关键词
continuous therapy; gastroesophageal reflux disease; maintenance; on-demand; proton pump inhibitor; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; PANTOPRAZOLE; 20; MG; HEALED EROSIVE ESOPHAGITIS; LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE; LANSOPRAZOLE; 15; CONTROLLED TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; RABEPRAZOLE; OMEPRAZOLE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000012732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aims: No consensus has been established regarding optimal long-term maintenance therapy in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of on-demand and continuous therapy with esomeprazole as maintenance treatments for GERD. Methods: Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy-proven GERD who received initial proton pumpinhibitor (PPI) therapy for 8 weeks were randomized to an on-demand group (esomeprazole 40 mg) or a continuous group (esomeprazole 20 mg). Intensities and frequencies of heartburn and acid regurgitation were assessed using a 6-point Likert scale (0=no symptoms; 5=very severe symptoms) and a 6-point frequency scale (0=none; 5=symptoms for > 5 days per week) at baseline (start of maintenance treatment) and after 12 weeks of treatment. Alleviation of symptoms was quantified using percentages of patients with a Likert scale or frequency scale of 0 or 1. Results: Of the 88 patients enrolled, 8 patients were excluded due to follow-up loss in early period of this study, and finally, 39 in the on-demand group and 41 in the continuous group were analyzed. No significant intergroup difference was found between Likert scale or frequency scale of heartburn or regurgitation at baseline. Percentages of symptom alleviations in the on-demand and continuous groups for intensity of heartburn were 56.4%/48.8% at baseline (P = .523) and 82.1%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .471), for frequency of heartburn were 61.5%/46.3% at baseline (P = .173) and 76.9%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .200), for intensity of regurgitation was 53.8%/43.9% at baseline (P = .374) and 82.1%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .471), and for frequency of regurgitation was 61.5%/56.1% at the baseline (P = .621) and 82.1%/82.9% at 12 weeks (P = .918), respectively. Furthermore, no significant intergroup difference was found for convenience of medication or subjective satisfaction. Conclusions: Intensities and frequencies of heartburn and regurgitation responded well to maintenance treatment in patients in the on-demand and continuous groups. On-demand therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg appears to be sufficient for maintenance treatment in GERD patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Management strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Bak, YT .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 19 :S49-S53
[2]   Intermittent and on-demand use of proton pump inhibitors in the management of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Bardhan, KD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (03) :S40-S48
[3]   Long-term treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with frequent symptomatic relapses using rabeprazole: on-demand treatment compared with continuous treatment [J].
Bour, B ;
Staub, JL ;
Chousterman, M ;
Labayle, D ;
Nalet, B ;
Nouel, O ;
Pariente, A ;
Tocque, E ;
Bonnot-Marlier, S .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (07) :805-812
[4]   Prognostic factors influencing relapse of oesophagitis during maintenance therapy with antisecretory drugs: A meta-analysis of long-term omeprazole trials [J].
Carlsson, R ;
Galmiche, JP ;
Dent, J ;
Lundell, L ;
Frison, L .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 11 (03) :473-482
[5]  
Cho Yu Kyung, 2010, Korean J Gastroenterol, V55, P279
[6]  
Cibor D, 2006, Adv Med Sci, V51, P336
[7]   An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management - the Genval workshop report [J].
Dent, J ;
Brun, J ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Janssens, J ;
Kahrilas, PJ ;
Lauritsen, K ;
Reynolds, JC ;
Shaw, M ;
Talley, NJ .
GUT, 1999, 44 :S1-S16
[8]   RETRACTED: Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease - art. no. CD003245.pub2 (Retracted Article) [J].
Donnellan, C ;
Sharma, N ;
Preston, C ;
Moayyedi, P .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (02)
[9]   A randomised prospective study comparing the effectiveness of esomeprazole treatment strategies in clinical practice for 6 months in the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Hansen, AN ;
Bergheim, R ;
Fagertun, H ;
Lund, H ;
Moum, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 (06) :665-671
[10]  
Hoshihara Y, 2000, Nihon Rinsho, V58, P1808