Model selection for wavelet-based signal estimation

被引:0
|
作者
Cherkassky, V [1 ]
Shao, XH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, ECE Dept, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
IEEE WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE | 1998年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There has been a growing interest in wavelet-based methods for signal estimation from noisy samples. Signal denoising involves calculating discrete wavelet transform (using training samples) and then discarding 'insignificant' wavelet coefficients (presumably corresponding to noise). Various wavelet thresholding heuristics for discarding insignificant wavelets have been recently proposed [Bruce et al, 1996; Donoho, 1993; Donoho and Johnstone, 1994]. These methods are conceptually based on asymptotic results for linear models, but also take into account special properties of wavelet basis functions. Wavelet thresholding represents a special case of model selection; hence we compare popular wavelet thresholding methods with model selection using VC generalization bounds developed for finite samples [Vapnik, 1982]. Since wavelet methods are linear (in parameters), VC bounds can be rigorously applied, i.e. the VC-dimension of linear models can be accurately estimated. Successful application of VC-theory to wavelet denoising also requires specification of a suitable structure on a set of wavelet basis functions. We propose such a structure suitable for orthogonal basis functions, which includes wavelets as a special case. The combination of the proposed structure with VC bounds yields a new powerful method for signal estimation with wavelets. Our comparisons indicate that using VC bounds for model selection gives uniformly better results than other wavelet thresholding methods under small sample! high noise setting. On the other hand, with large samples model selection becomes trivial, and most reasonable methods (including wavelet thresholding heuristics) perform reasonably well.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 848
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESEARCH ON THE SELECTION OF WAVELET BASES FOR WAVELET-BASED SIGNAL TREND ELIMINATION
    Yang Lin
    Wang Chong-yang
    Wu Zhi-cheng
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WAVELET ACTIVE MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (LCWAMTIP), 2012, : 20 - 24
  • [2] Wavelet-based estimation in a semiparametric regression model
    de Dieu Nkou, Emmanuel
    Nkiet, Guy Martial
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WAVELETS MULTIRESOLUTION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2022, 20 (02)
  • [3] Wavelet-based 2-D multichannel signal estimation
    Atkinson, I
    Kamalabadi, F
    Mohan, S
    Jones, DL
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 141 - 144
  • [4] Wavelet-based estimation of the nonstationary mean signal in wireless systems
    Narasimhan, R
    Cox, DC
    IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 18 (11) : 2220 - 2226
  • [5] Wavelet-based signal extrapolation
    Croft, MJ
    Hogan, JA
    ISSPA 96 - FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 752 - 755
  • [6] Wavelet-Based Density Estimation in a Heteroscedastic Convolution Model
    Chesneau, Christophe
    Fadili, Jalal
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2013, 42 (17) : 3085 - 3099
  • [7] Wavelet-based robust estimation and variable selection in nonparametric additive models
    Amato, Umberto
    Antoniadis, Anestis
    De Feis, Italia
    Gijbels, Irene
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2022, 32 (01)
  • [8] Wavelet-based robust estimation and variable selection in nonparametric additive models
    Umberto Amato
    Anestis Antoniadis
    Italia De Feis
    Irène Gijbels
    Statistics and Computing, 2022, 32
  • [9] Wavelet-based algorithm for signal analysis
    Tse, Norman C. F.
    Lai, L. L.
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 2007 (1)
  • [10] WAVELET-BASED METHODS FOR SIGNAL DENOISING
    Yaseen, Alauldeen S.
    Pavlov, Alexey N.
    2018 2ND SCHOOL ON DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX NETWORKS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN INTELLECTUAL ROBOTICS (DCNAIR), 2018, : 152 - 153