Time series analysis of use patterns for common invasive technologies in critically ill patients

被引:14
作者
Berthiaume, Luc R. [1 ]
Peets, Adam D. [1 ]
Schmidt, Ulrich [2 ]
Shahpori, Reza [1 ]
Doig, Chip J. [1 ]
Boiteau, Paul J. E. [1 ]
Stelfox, Henry Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Critical care medicine; Technology; Patient safety; Medical education; PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERS; SEPSIS CAMPAIGN GUIDELINES; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIANS; KNOWLEDGE; DIFFUSION; OUTCOMES; HEART; LUNG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.07.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Critically ill patients are frequently managed with invasive technologies as part of their medical care. Little is known about use patterns. We examined use trends for invasive technologies used in critically ill patients. Materials and Methods: Using time series analysis and data on 26 989 patients from 3 medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) (n = 18 224) and 1 surgical ICU (n = 8765) between January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2007, we measured changes in the proportion of patients receiving the 4 most frequently used invasive technologies used in critically ill patients. Results: The 4 most common invasive technologies used in critically ill patients during the study period were arterial lines (71%), endotracheal intubations (61%), central venous catheters (51%), and pulmonary artery catheters (18%). The proportion of ICU patients who received pulmonary artery catheters decreased from 25% in 1999 to 8% in 2006 (P < .001). Use of central venous catheters increased from 39% to 46% (P < .001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients admitted in 2006 were 4 times less likely to receive a pulmonary artery catheter (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.33), but 42% (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.58) more likely to receive a central venous catheter than patients admitted in 1999. No significant changes were observed for intubations and arterial lines. Conclusions: The use of invasive technologies in critically ill patients is changing and may have important implications for resource use, clinician education, and patient care. Initiatives should be considered for ensuring clinician competency during technology transitions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:471.e9 / 471.e14
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   MONITORING THE DIFFUSION OF A TECHNOLOGY - CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY IN ONTARIO [J].
ANDERSON, GM ;
LOMAS, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1988, 78 (03) :251-254
[2]   Caring for the critically ill patient - Challenges and opportunities [J].
Angus, Derek C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (04) :456-458
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]   THE DIFFUSION OF THE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SCANNER IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BANTA, HD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 1980, 10 (02) :251-269
[5]   Pulmonary artery catheterization and clinical outcomes - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration workshop report [J].
Bernard, GR ;
Sopko, G ;
Cerra, F ;
Demling, R ;
Edmunds, H ;
Kaplan, S ;
Kessler, L ;
Masur, H ;
Parsons, P ;
Shure, D ;
Webb, C ;
Weidemann, H ;
Weinmann, G ;
Williams, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (19) :2568-2572
[6]   The first intensive care unit in the world: Copenhagen 1953 [J].
Berthelsen, PG ;
Cronqvist, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (10) :1190-1195
[7]   Critical care delivery in the intensive care unit: Defining clinical roles and the best practice model [J].
Brilli, RJ ;
Spevetz, A ;
Branson, RD ;
Campbell, GM ;
Cohen, H ;
Dasta, JF ;
Harvey, MA ;
Kelley, MA ;
Kelly, KM ;
Rudis, MI ;
St Andre, AC ;
Stone, JR ;
Teres, D ;
Weled, BJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (10) :2007-2019
[8]   The short- and long-term impact of multi-disciplinary clinics in addition to standard nephrology care on patient outcomes [J].
Curtis, BM ;
Ravani, P ;
Malberti, F ;
Kennett, F ;
Taylor, PA ;
Djurdjev, O ;
Levin, A .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (01) :147-154
[9]   Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [J].
Dellinger, RP ;
Carlet, JM ;
Masur, H ;
Gerlach, H ;
Calandra, T ;
Cohen, J ;
Gea-Banacloche, J ;
Keh, D ;
Marshall, JC ;
Parker, MM ;
Ramsay, G ;
Zimmerman, JL ;
Vincent, JL ;
Levy, MM .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (04) :536-555
[10]   Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [J].
Dellinger, RP ;
Carlet, JM ;
Masur, H ;
Gerlach, H ;
Calandra, T ;
Cohen, J ;
Gea-Banacloche, J ;
Keh, D ;
Marshall, JC ;
Parker, MM ;
Ramsay, G ;
Zimmerman, JL ;
Vincent, JL ;
Levy, MM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) :858-873