Critical rationalism (Gomory's blurry theory) or positivism (Thyer's theoretical myopia): Which is the prescription for social work research?

被引:10
作者
Gomory, T
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10437797.2001.10779037
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article is the last of four in a debate between a critical rationalist (falsificationist) and a positivist (justificationist) about the value and utility of theory in social work. The critical rationalist position and its criticism of the positivist approach to theory and the pursuit of science in social work are reviewed and explained in seven theses and a little commentary. Some criticisms about how critical rationalists choose among theories and interventions are answered. Finally, the use and misuse of quasi-experimental research in social work are addressed briefly.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 78
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Agassi J., 1981, SCI SOC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PLACEBO PANACEA PUTT
[3]  
[Anonymous], CASEWORK COMPETENCY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Social Work Practice: A Critical Thinker's Guide
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Putting families first: An experiment in family preservation
[7]  
Campbell D.T., 1966, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research
[8]  
DEWAN MJ, 1989, LIMITS BIOL TREATMEN, P189
[9]   Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice [J].
Gambrill, E .
FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN SERVICES, 1999, 80 (04) :341-350
[10]  
Gambrill ED., 1977, BEHAV MODIFICATION H