Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine wash versus benzoyl peroxide soap for home surgical preparation: neither is effective in removing Cutibacterium from the skin of shoulder arthroplasty patients

被引:14
作者
Hsu, Jason E. [1 ]
Whitson, Anastasia J. [1 ]
Woodhead, Benjamin M. [1 ]
Napierala, Matthew A. [1 ]
Gong, Davin [2 ]
Matsen, Frederick A., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, 1959 NE Pacific St,Box 356500, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, 1959 NE Pacific St,Box 356500, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Chlorhexidine; Benzoyl peroxide; Prophylaxis; Shoulder surgery; Shoulder arthroplasty; Cutibacterium; PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES; RISK-FACTORS; INFECTION; EFFICACY; CULTURES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-020-04594-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Home chlorhexidine washes prior to shoulder surgery are commonly used in an attempt to reduce the skin bacterial load. However, recent studies have suggested that this agent is relatively ineffective against Cutibacterium acne. Benzoyl peroxide soap is a treatment for acne, but evidence regarding its effectiveness as prophylaxis in shoulder surgery is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of home chlorhexidine washes with benzoyl peroxide soap (BPO) in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty surgery in reducing Cutibacterium levels on the skin surface and in the dermis. Methods Fifty male patients planning to undergo shoulder arthroplasty were consented to be randomized into treatment with 4% chlorhexidine solution (CHG) and 10% benzoyl peroxide soap (BPO) used to wash the operative shoulder the night prior and morning of surgery. Skin swabs prior to incision and dermal wound swabs after incision were obtained, and the bacterial load was reported in a semiquantitative manner as the Specimen Cutibacterium Value (SpCuV). The two groups were compared with regards to the percent positivity of the skin surface and incised dermal edge as well as the bacterial load at each site. Results Skin surface swabs were positive in 100% of patients using CHG and 100% of patients using BPO soap. The Cutibacterium load (SpCuV) on the skin surface was similar between the two groups (CHG 1.6 +/- 1.1 vs. BPO 1.5 +/- 1.4, p = 0.681). The percentages of dermal cultures that were positive were not significantly different between the two groups (CHG 61% vs BPO 46%, p = 0.369). The Cutibacterium load (SpCuV) on the incised dermal edge was similar between the two groups (CHG 0.8 +/- 1.0 vs. BPO 0.8 +/- 1.4, p = 0.991). Discussion Neither BPO soap nor chlorhexidine washes prior to shoulder surgery were effective in eliminating Cutibacterium from the skin surface or the incised dermal edge. Further study of means of reducing the Cutibacterium load of the skin at the time of shoulder arthroplasty is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1329
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Propionibacterium acnes: from Commensal to Opportunistic Biofilm-Associated Implant Pathogen [J].
Achermann, Yvonne ;
Goldstein, Ellie J. C. ;
Coenye, Tom ;
Shirtliff, Mark E. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2014, 27 (03) :419-440
[2]   Characterizing the Propionibacterium Load in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty A Study of 137 Culture-Positive Cases [J].
Ahsan, Zahab S. ;
Somerson, Jeremy S. ;
Matsen, Frederick A., III .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (02) :150-154
[3]   Optimization of Periprosthetic Culture for Diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes Prosthetic Joint Infection [J].
Butler-Wu, Susan M. ;
Burns, Erica M. ;
Pottinger, Paul S. ;
Magaret, Amalia S. ;
Rakeman, Jennifer L. ;
Matsen, Frederick A., III ;
Cookson, Brad T. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (07) :2490-2495
[4]   Prosthesis Failure Within 2 Years of Implantation Is Highly Predictive of Infection [J].
Eugenia Portillo, Maria ;
Salvado, Margarita ;
Alier, Albert ;
Sorli, Lluisa ;
Martinez, Santos ;
Pablo Horcajada, Juan ;
Puig, Lluis .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (11) :3672-3678
[5]   Contamination of the Surgical Field with Propionibacterium acnes in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty [J].
Falconer, Travis M. ;
Baba, Mohammed ;
Dorrestijn, Oscar ;
Donaldson, Matthew J. ;
Smith, Margaret M. ;
Figtree, Melanie C. ;
Hudson, Bernard J. ;
Cass, Benjamin ;
Young, Allan A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (20) :1722-1728
[6]   Infection after primary anatomic versus primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Florschuetz, Anthony V. ;
Lane, Paul D. ;
Crosby, Lynn A. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (08) :1296-1301
[7]  
FRANK RM, 2018, JB JS OPEN ACCESS, V3
[8]   Preoperative skin cultures are predictive of Propionibacterium load in deep cultures obtained at revision shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Hsu, Jason E. ;
Neradilek, Moni B. ;
Russ, Stacy M. ;
Matsen, Frederick A., III .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (05) :765-770
[9]   Propionibacterium in Shoulder Arthroplasty What We Think We Know Today [J].
Hsu, Jason E. ;
Bumgarner, Roger E. ;
Matsen, Frederick A., III .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (07) :597-606
[10]   Propionibacterium acnes in primary shoulder arthroplasty: rates of colonization, patient risk factors, and efficacy of perioperative prophylaxis [J].
Koh, Chuan Kong ;
Marsh, Jonathan P. ;
Drinkovic, Dragana ;
Walker, Cameron G. ;
Poon, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (05) :846-852