Internal dose escalation associated with increased local control for melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

被引:11
作者
Kennedy, William R. [1 ]
DeWees, Todd A. [3 ]
Acharya, Sahaja [4 ]
Mahmood, Mustafaa [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Goddu, S. Murty [1 ]
Kavanaugh, James A. [1 ]
Mitchell, Timothy J. [1 ]
Rich, Keith M. [2 ]
Kim, Albert H. [2 ]
Leuthardt, Eric C. [2 ]
Dowling, Joshua L. [2 ]
Dunn, Gavin P. [2 ]
Chicoine, Michael R. [2 ]
Perkins, Stephanie M. [1 ]
Huang, Jiayi [1 ]
Tsien, Christina I. [1 ]
Robinson, Clifford G. [1 ]
Abraham, Christopher D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Biomed Stat & Informat, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 332 N Lauderdale St, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
关键词
melanoma; brain metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; Gamma Knife; dose escalation; local control; oncology; THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP; CELL LUNG-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; COMBINED NIVOLUMAB; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FMISO-PET; SURVIVAL; IPILIMUMAB; PEMBROLIZUMAB;
D O I
10.3171/2020.7.JNS192210
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The internal high-dose volume varies widely for a given prescribed dose during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to treat brain metastases (BMs). This may be altered during treatment planning, and the authors have previously shown that this improves local control (LC) for non-small cell lung cancer BMs without increasing toxicity. Here, they seek to identify potentially actionable dosimetric predictors of LC after SRS for melanoma BM. METHODS The records of patients with unresected melanoma BM treated with single-fraction Gamma Knife RS be-tween 2006 and 2017 were reviewed. LC was assessed on a per-lesion basis, defined as stability or a decrease in lesion size. Outcome-oriented approaches were utilized to determine optimal dichotomization for dosimetric variables relative to LC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was implemented to evaluate the impact of collected pa-rameters on LC. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven melanoma BMs in 79 patients were identified. The median age was 56 years (range 31-86 years). The median follow-up was 7.6 months (range 0.5-81.6 months), and the median survival was 9.3 months (range 1.3-81.6 months). Lesions were optimally stratified by volume receiving at least 30 Gy (V30) greater than or equal to versus less than 25%. V30 was >= and < 25% in 147 and 140 lesions, respectively. For all patients, 1-year LC was 83% versus 66% for V30 >= and < 25%, respectively (p = 0.001). Stratifying by volume, lesions 2 cm or less (n = 215) had 1-year LC of 82% versus 70% (p = 0.013) for V30 >= and < 25%, respectively. Lesions > 2 to 3 cm (n = 32) had 1-year LC of 100% versus 43% (p = 0.214) for V30 >= and < 25%, respectively. V30 was still predictive of LC even after controlling for the use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Radionecrosis occurred in 2.8% of lesions and was not significantly associated with V30. CONCLUSIONS For a given prescription dose, an increased internal high-dose volume, as indicated by measures such as V30 >= 25%, is associated with improved LC but not increased toxicity in single-fraction SRS for melanoma BM. Internal dose escalation is an independent predictor of improved LC even in patients receiving immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy. This represents a dosimetric parameter that is actionable at the time of treatment planning and war-rants further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 861
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Internal dose escalation is associated with increased local control for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)
    Abraham, Christopher
    Garsa, Adam
    Badiyan, Shahed N.
    Drzymala, Robert
    Yang, Deshan
    DeWees, Todd
    Tsien, Christina
    Dowling, Joshua L.
    Rich, Keith M.
    Chicoine, Michael R.
    Kim, Albert H.
    Leuthardt, Eric C.
    Robinson, Cliff
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 3 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [2] Repeated in-field radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Feasibility, results and survival in a heavily treated patient cohort
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    Stera, Susanne
    von der Gruen, Jens Mueller
    Loutfi-Krauss, Britta
    Forster, Marie-Therese
    Wagner, Marlies
    Keller, Christian
    Roedel, Claus
    Seifert, Volker
    Blanck, Oliver
    Wolff, Robert
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [3] Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Chen, Linda
    Douglass, Jacqueline
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    Ye, Xiaobu
    Marciscano, Ariel E.
    Forde, Patrick M.
    Brahmer, Julie
    Lipson, Evan
    Sharfman, William
    Hammers, Hans
    Naidoo, Jarushka
    Bettegowda, Chetan
    Lim, Michael
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (04): : 916 - 925
  • [4] Stereotactic Radiosurgery With or Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Limited Brain Metastases: A Secondary Analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0574 (Alliance) Randomized Controlled Trial
    Churilla, Thomas M.
    Ballman, Karla V.
    Brown, Paul D.
    Twohy, Erin L.
    Jaeckle, Kurt
    Farace, Elana
    Cerhan, Jane H.
    Anderson, S. Keith
    Carrero, Xiomara W.
    Garces, Yolanda I.
    Barker, Fred G., II
    Deming, Richard
    Dixon, Jesse G.
    Burri, Stuart H.
    Chung, Caroline
    Menard, Cynthia
    Stieber, Volker W.
    Pollock, Bruce E.
    Galanis, Evanthia
    Buckner, Jan C.
    Asher, Anthony L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (05): : 1173 - 1178
  • [5] Volume dependence in hypoxia-targeted dose escalation
    Chvetsov, Alexei V.
    Zeng, Jing
    Rajendran, Joseph G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 5325 - 5331
  • [6] An application of changepoint methods in studying the effect of age on survival in breast cancer
    Contal, C
    O'Quigley, J
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1999, 30 (03) : 253 - 270
  • [7] Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial
    Davies, Michael A.
    Saiag, Philippe
    Robert, Caroline
    Grob, Jean-Jacques
    Flaherty, Keith T.
    Arance, Ana
    Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna
    Thomas, Luc
    Lesimple, Thierry
    Mortier, Laurent
    Moschos, Stergios J.
    Hogg, David
    Marquez-Rodas, Ivan
    Del Vecchio, Michele
    Lebbe, Celeste
    Meyer, Nicolas
    Zhang, Ying
    Huang, Yingjie
    Mookerjee, Bijoyesh
    Long, Georgina V.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (07) : 863 - 873
  • [8] Prognostic Factors for Survival in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases
    Davies, Michael A.
    Liu, Ping
    McIntyre, Susan
    Kim, Kevin B.
    Papadopoulos, Nicholas
    Hwu, Wen-Jen
    Hwu, Patrick
    Bedikian, Agop
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (08) : 1687 - 1696
  • [9] Pembrolizumab for patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer and untreated brain metastases: early analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial
    Goldberg, Sarah B.
    Gettinger, Scott N.
    Mahajan, Amit
    Chiang, Anne C.
    Herbst, Roy S.
    Sznol, Mario
    Tsiouris, Apostolos John
    Cohen, Justine
    Vortmeyer, Alexander
    Jilaveanu, Lucia
    Yu, James
    Hegde, Upendra
    Speaker, Stephanie
    Madura, Matthew
    Ralabate, Amanda
    Rivera, Angel
    Rowen, Elin
    Gerrish, Heather
    Yao, Xiaopan
    Chiang, Veronica
    Kluger, Harriet M.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (07) : 976 - 983
  • [10] Hypoxia imaging with [F-18] FMISO-PET in head and neck cancer: Potential for guiding intensity modulated radiation therapy in overcoming hypoxia-induced treatment resistance
    Hendrickson, Kristi
    Phillips, Mark
    Smith, Wade
    Peterson, Lanell
    Krohn, Kenneth
    Rajendran, Joseph
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) : 369 - 375