Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians - A systematic review

被引:506
作者
VanGeest, Jonathan B. [1 ]
Johnson, Timothy P.
Welch, Verna L.
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Morehouse Sch Med, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
关键词
physicians; surveys; research methods; response rates;
D O I
10.1177/0163278707307899
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although physician surveys are an important tool in health services and policy research, they are often characterized by low response rates. The authors conducted a systematic review of 66 published reports of efforts to improve response rates to physician surveys. Two general strategies were explored in this literature: incentive and design-based approaches. Even small financial incentives were found to be effective in improving physician response. Token nonmonetary incentives were much less effective. In terms of design strategies, postal and telephone strategies have generally been more successful than have fax or Web-based approaches, with evidence also supporting use of mixed-mode surveys in this population. In addition, use of first-class stamps on return envelopes and questionnaires designed to be brief, personalized, and endorsed by legitimizing professional associations were also more likely to be successful. Researchers should continue to implement design strategies that have been documented to improve the survey response of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 321
页数:19
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty [J].
Akl, EA ;
Maroun, N ;
Klocke, RA ;
Montori, V ;
Schünemann, HJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (04) :425-429
[2]   Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget - A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives [J].
Asch, DA ;
Christakis, NA ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :95-99
[3]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[4]   DIFFERENT RESPONSE RATES IN A TRIAL OF 2 ENVELOPE STYLES IN MAIL SURVEY-RESEARCH [J].
ASCH, DA ;
CHRISTAKIS, NA .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :364-365
[5]   Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research [J].
Asch, S ;
Connor, SE ;
Hamilton, EG ;
Fox, SA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (08) :591-599
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey [J].
Baron, G ;
De Wals, P ;
Milord, F .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (01) :47-52
[7]   THE USE OF A PREPAID INCENTIVE TO CONVERT NONRESPONDERS ON A SURVEY OF PHYSICIANS [J].
BERK, ML ;
EDWARDS, WS ;
GAY, NL .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1993, 16 (02) :239-245
[8]   INTERVIEWING PHYSICIANS - THE EFFECT OF IMPROVED RESPONSE RATE [J].
BERK, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1985, 75 (11) :1338-1340
[9]   PHYSICIAN RESPONSE TO A MAILED SURVEY - AN EXPERIMENT IN TIMING OF PAYMENT [J].
BERRY, SH ;
KANOUSE, DE .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (01) :102-114
[10]   A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: effect on primary response rates [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Devereaux, PJ ;
Swiontkowski, MF ;
Schemitsch, EH ;
Shankardass, K ;
Sprague, S ;
Guyatt, GH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (04) :634-636