Use of artificial waterholes by animals in the southern region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa

被引:26
|
作者
Sutherland, Klinette [1 ]
Ndlovu, Mduduzi [1 ,2 ]
Perez-Rodriguez, Anton [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Dept Zool & Entomol, POB 339, ZA-9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa
[2] Univ Mpumalanga, Sch Biol & Environm Sci, ZA-1200 Mbombela, South Africa
关键词
animal abundance; camera-trap; protected areas; water; wildlife; INTERFERENCE COMPETITION; LARGE HERBIVORES; MULTIMODEL INFERENCE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; WATERING POINTS; MODEL SELECTION; PREDATION RISK; WILDLIFE; VEGETATION; ELEPHANTS;
D O I
10.3957/056.048.023003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Artificial waterholes are a widely used, yet contested wildlife management practice in semi-arid environments. We evaluated wildlife water provisioning at four artificial waterholes in the southern region of the Kruger National Park. We documented daily waterhole visitation patterns of mammals during the wet and dry seasons using camera-traps. We recorded 26 mammal species at the waterholes, with African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and impalas (Aepyceros melampus) being the most abundant. We used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to determine which variables (season, time of day, water quality, and the presence of carnivores or elephants) would affect animal visitation. Waterhole visitation patterns differed according to time of day, but this effect remained relatively constant between seasons. More animals visited waterholes in the dry season compared to the wet season. Carnivore presence negatively affected impala abundance. Elephant presence did not affect impala and white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) visits to waterholes. Water quality also appeared to play a role in determining animal abundance. Based on our results, though obtained from a limited sample size, we suggest some management practices to be considered when deciding which waterholes should be dosed down or left open.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes during a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Janecke, Beanelri B.
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (08):
  • [2] Legitimacy and the Use of Natural Resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Tanner, Randy
    Freimund, Wayne
    Van Wyk, Ernita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03) : 71 - 85
  • [3] Termite diversity along a catena in southern Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Lind, Brianna M.
    Hanan, Niall P.
    Gigliotti, Laura C.
    Allen, Rachel L.
    McHenry, Alex
    Gardiner, Alan
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2019, 57 (01) : 160 - 165
  • [4] Safety of travel in South Africa: The Kruger National Park
    Durrheim, DN
    Braack, L
    Grobler, D
    Bryden, H
    Speare, R
    Leggat, P
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (04) : 176 - 191
  • [5] A checklist of the termites of Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Lind, Brianna M.
    Davies, Andrew B.
    KOEDOE, 2019, 61 (01):
  • [6] Rhinoceros accounting in Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Ferreira, Sam M.
    Dziba, Luthando
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2023, 72
  • [7] Vegetation distribution along a granite catena, southern Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Theron, Ettienne J.
    van Aardt, Andri C.
    du Preez, Pieter J.
    KOEDOE, 2020, 62 (02): : 1 - 11
  • [8] Landscape heterogeneity and the use of space by elephants in the Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Grainger, M
    van Aarde, R
    Whyte, I
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2005, 43 (04) : 369 - 375
  • [10] Feeding preferences of Oxpeckers in Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Ndlovu, Mduduzi
    Combrink, Leigh
    KOEDOE, 2015, 57 (01): : 1 - 6