The optimal particle-mesh interpolation basis

被引:5
作者
Wang, Han [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Xingyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Appl Phys & Computat Math, Fenghao East Rd 2, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[2] CAEP Software Ctr High Performance Numer Simulat, Huayuan Rd 6, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[3] Lab Computat Phys, Huayuan Rd 6, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PERIODIC BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; EWALD METHOD; ELECTROSTATIC SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; LIQUID WATER; SUMS; SIMULATION; TOOLKIT;
D O I
10.1063/1.4994857
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The fast Ewald methods are widely used to compute the point-charge electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations. The key step that introduces errors in the computation is the particle-mesh interpolation. In this work, the optimal interpolation basis is derived by minimizing the estimated error of the fast Ewald method. The basis can be either general or model specific, depending on whether or not the charge correlation has been taken into account. By using the TIP3P water as an example system, we demonstrate that the general optimal basis is always more accurate than the B-spline basis in the investigated parameter range, while the computational cost is at most 5% more expensive. In some cases, the optimal basis is found to be two orders of magnitude more accurate. The model specific optimal basis further improves the accuracy of the general optimal basis, but requires more computational effort in the optimization, and may not be transferable to systems with different charge correlations. Therefore, the choice between the general and model specific optimal bases is a trade-off between the generality and the accuracy. Published by AIP Publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   How to Convert SPME to P3M: Influence Functions and Error Estimates [J].
Ballenegger, V. ;
Cerda, J. J. ;
Holm, C. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2012, 8 (03) :936-947
[2]   Simulations of non-neutral slab systems with long-range electrostatic interactions in two-dimensional periodic boundary conditions [J].
Ballenegger, V. ;
Arnold, A. ;
Cerda, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 131 (09)
[3]   PARTICLE MESH EWALD - AN N.LOG(N) METHOD FOR EWALD SUMS IN LARGE SYSTEMS [J].
DARDEN, T ;
YORK, D ;
PEDERSEN, L .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 98 (12) :10089-10092
[4]   SIMULATION OF ELECTROSTATIC SYSTEMS IN PERIODIC BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS 2. EQUIVALENCE OF BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS [J].
DELEEUW, SW ;
PERRAM, JW ;
SMITH, ER .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1980, 373 (1752) :57-66
[5]   SIMULATION OF ELECTROSTATIC SYSTEMS IN PERIODIC BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS .1. LATTICE SUMS AND DIELECTRIC-CONSTANTS [J].
DELEEUW, SW ;
PERRAM, JW ;
SMITH, ER .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1980, 373 (1752) :27-56
[6]   How to mesh up Ewald sums. II. An accurate error estimate for the particle-particle-particle-mesh algorithm [J].
Deserno, M ;
Holm, C .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 109 (18) :7694-7701
[7]   How to mesh up Ewald sums. I. A theoretical and numerical comparison of various particle mesh routines [J].
Deserno, M ;
Holm, C .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 109 (18) :7678-7693
[8]   A SMOOTH PARTICLE MESH EWALD METHOD [J].
ESSMANN, U ;
PERERA, L ;
BERKOWITZ, ML ;
DARDEN, T ;
LEE, H ;
PEDERSEN, LG .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 103 (19) :8577-8593
[9]  
Ewald PP, 1921, ANN PHYS-BERLIN, V64, P253
[10]  
Fletcher R., 2013, PRACTICAL METHODS OP