Moral Awareness of College Students Regarding Artificial Intelligence

被引:22
作者
Ghotbi, Nader [1 ]
Ho, Manh Tung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific Univ, Beppu, Oita, Japan
[2] Phenikaa Univ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Social Res, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Artificial Intelligence (AI); Emotional AI (EAI); Ethics of technology; Japan; Moral awareness; Medical education;
D O I
10.1007/s41649-021-00182-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the moral awareness of college students regarding artificial intelligence (AI) systems, we have examined 467 surveys collected from 152 Japanese and 315 non-Japanese students in an international university in Japan. The students were asked to choose a most significant moral problem of AI applications in the future from a list of ten ethical issues and to write an essay about it. The results show that most of the students (n = 269, 58%) considered unemployment to be the major ethical issue related to AI. The second largest group of students (n = 54, 12%) was concerned with ethical issues related to emotional AI, including the impact of AI on human behavior and emotion and robots' rights and emotions. A relatively small number of students referred to the risk of social control by AI (6%), AI discrimination (6%), increasing inequality (5%), loss of privacy (4%), AI mistakes (3%), malicious AI (3%), and AI security breaches (3%). Calculation of the z score for two population proportions shows that Japanese students were much less concerned about AI control of society (- 3.1276, p < 0.01) than non-Japanese students, but more concerned about discrimination (2.2757, p < 0.05). Female students were less concerned about unemployment (- 2.6108, p < 0.01) than males, but more concerned about discrimination (2.4333, p < 0.05). The study concludes that the moral awareness of college students regarding AI technologies is quite limited and recommends including the ethics of AI in the curriculum.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 433
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Agrawal Ajay., 2019, INNOVATION POLICY EC, V19, P139, DOI [10.1086/699935, DOI 10.1086/699935]
[2]  
ALAIERI F, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V9979
[3]  
Bartneck C., 2021, An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI, P61, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-51110-48
[4]  
Boddington Paula, 2017, Towards a code of ethics for artificial intelligence, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4]
[5]  
Bossman J., 2016, World Economic Forum
[6]   Data-driven governance, smart urbanism and risk-class inequalities: Security and social credit in China [J].
Curran, Dean ;
Smart, Alan .
URBAN STUDIES, 2021, 58 (03) :487-506
[7]  
Fiori M, 2018, SPRINGER SER HUM EXC, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-90633-1_2
[8]   AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations [J].
Floridi, Luciano ;
Cowls, Josh ;
Beltrametti, Monica ;
Chatila, Raja ;
Chazerand, Patrice ;
Dignum, Virginia ;
Luetge, Christoph ;
Madelin, Robert ;
Pagallo, Ugo ;
Rossi, Francesca ;
Schafer, Burkhard ;
Valcke, Peggy ;
Vayena, Effy .
MINDS AND MACHINES, 2018, 28 (04) :689-707
[9]   Attitude of college students towards ethical issues of artificial intelligence in an international university in Japan [J].
Ghotbi, Nader ;
Ho, Manh Tung ;
Mantello, Peter .
AI & SOCIETY, 2022, 37 (01) :283-290
[10]  
Hagerty Alexa, 2019, ARXIV190707892V1