Upgrading secondary wastewater plant effluent by modified coagulation and flocculation, for water reuse in irrigation

被引:3
作者
Ghaneian, Mohammad Taghi [1 ]
Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan [1 ]
Ehsanzadeh, Eghbal [2 ]
Nikoonahad, Ali [1 ]
Miri, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Dept Environm Hlth Engn, Sch Publ Hlth, Yazd, Iran
[2] Ilam Univ, Dept Water Engn, Fac Agr, Ilam, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION | 2017年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
advanced treatment; upgrading secondary effluent; water reuse; Yazd-ICEAS; REMOVAL; COAGULATION/FLOCCULATION; SULFATE;
D O I
10.2166/wrd.2016.049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, the feasibility of using coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation (CF-S) for advanced treatment of secondary effluent released from the Yazd Intermittent Cycle Extended Aeration System was investigated. Four coagulants including ferric chloride (FeCl3), polyaluminum chloride (PAC), ferrous sulfate (FeSo(4)), and potassiumferrate (K(2)FeSo(4)) along with Gflog C-150 as flocculant polymer were used. In this study, returned chemical sludge was considered as a modification. Preliminary CF-S processes showed that FeSO4 and K2FeO4 had low removal efficiencies. Thus, these two coagulants were abandoned and CF-S processes were continued only with PAC and FeCl3 coagulants which had higher efficiencies in the removal of biological oxygen demand (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), and turbidity. Removal efficiency was higher when half of the chemical producing sludge was returned as compared with using both coagulants simultaneously along with 2 mg L-1 of C-150 as flocculant. In the optimum dosage, when half of PAC and FeCl3 sludge were returned, the volume of produced sludge was reduced by 40% and 28%, respectively, as compared without returned sludge. For the PAC coagulant in the optimum dosage with half of the sludge returned, all 2012 EPA standards of irrigation were met for both 'processed and non-processed type' agricultural crops.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 306
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Microscopic observation of particle reduction in slaughterhouse wastewater by coagulation-flocculation using ferric sulphate as coagulant and different coagulant aids [J].
Aguilar, MI ;
Sáez, J ;
Lloréns, M ;
Soler, A ;
Ortuño, JF .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (09) :2233-2241
[2]  
Al-Jasser A.O., 2011, Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, V23, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JKSUES.2009.06.001
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EPA GUID WAT REUS
[4]   Colour removal from landfill leachate by coagulation and flocculation processes [J].
Aziz, Hamidi Abdul ;
Alias, Salina ;
Adlan, Mohd. Nordin ;
Faridah ;
Asaari, A. H. ;
Zahari, Mohd. Shahrir .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (01) :218-220
[5]   Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: An autopsy study of a pilot plant [J].
Chon, Kangmin ;
Kim, Seung Joon ;
Moon, Jihee ;
Cho, Jaeweon .
WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (06) :1803-1816
[6]   Electrophoretic nature and evaluation of poly-aluminum-chloride-sulfate (PACS) as a coagulant for water and wastewater treatment [J].
Gao, BY ;
Yue, QY ;
Wang, BJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 38 (05) :897-907
[7]   Optimization of alum-coagulation/flocculation for COD and TSS removal from five municipal wastewater [J].
Guida, Marco ;
Mattei, Marialuisa ;
Della Rocca, Clauido ;
Melluso, Giovanni ;
Meric, Suereyya .
DESALINATION, 2007, 211 (1-3) :113-127
[8]  
Hassan M.A. A., 2009, J CHEM NATURAL RESOU, V4, P43, DOI DOI 10.5424/SJAR/2005032-139
[9]   Combined coagulation flocculation pre treatment unit for municipal wastewater [J].
Ismail, Ibrahim M. ;
Fawzy, Ahmed S. ;
Abdel-Monem, Nabil M. ;
Mahmoud, H. Mahmoud ;
El-Halwany, Mohamed A. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH, 2012, 3 (04) :331-336
[10]   The application of potassium ferrate for sewage treatment [J].
Jiang, JQ ;
Panagouopoulos, A ;
Bauer, M ;
Pearce, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (02) :215-220