Effects of grazing corn plant residue on beef cattle performance, residue characteristics, and subsequent crop yield

被引:5
作者
Lehman, B. E. [1 ]
Ewing, K. P. [1 ]
Liu, T. [2 ]
Villamil, M. B. [3 ]
Rodriguez, L. F. [2 ]
Green-Miller, A. R. [2 ]
Shike, D. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Anim Sci Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Agr & Biol Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2021年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词
corn residue; strip grazing; continuous graz-ing; integrated crop-livestock; SOIL COMPACTION; MANAGEMENT; PROPERTY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.15232/aas.2020-02129
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of grazing method on beef cattle performance, residue characteristics, and subsequent corn grain yields. Materials and Methods: This was a 3-yr study in which strip-grazing (SG), continuous grazing (CG), and ungrazed control (CT) treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications per year on a continuous corn production system in central Illinois. Strip-grazed plots were divided into subplots (1, 2, 3) in which cattle back-grazed. Thirty-six spring-calving, multiparous, Angus cows were used in the first and second year of the study and 42 winter-calving Angus heifers were used in the third year. Cattle grazed for 42 d each year following corn harvest. Results and Discussion: Cattle in SG plots were 9.8 kg heavier (P = 0.05) postgrazing compared with those on CG plots but did not differ (P = 0.77) in final BCS, indicating adequate performance was maintained regardless of treatment. The SG and CG plots had increased ADF (P = 0.03) and decreased CP (P < 0.01) after grazing compared with CT. In year 2 postgrazing, SG and CG had decreased (P < 0.01) total residue availability, leaves and husks, and cobs compared with CT, suggesting more digestible, nutrient-dense components were selected during grazing. No differences (P = 0.16) were detected for corn yield among grazing treatments. However, yield was different (P = 0.05) among strips. Strip 1 had lower yields than strip 2, which may have been due to increased cattle trafficking in this area. Implications and Applications: Both grazing methods resulted in acceptable performance. Grazing corn residue did not affect subsequent crop yields; however, strip differences in yield within strip-grazed paddocks warrant further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 663
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Soil Survey Staff
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL, V8th
[3]  
Betteridge K, 1999, AUST J SOIL RES, V37, P743
[4]   Soil surface property and soybean yield response to corn stover grazing [J].
Clark, JT ;
Russell, JR ;
Karlen, DL ;
Singleton, PL ;
Busby, WD ;
Peterson, BC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (05) :1364-1371
[5]   Spatial Distribution of Inorganic Nitrogen in Pastures as Affected by Management, Landscape, and Cattle Locus [J].
Dahal, Subash ;
Franklin, Dorcas H. ;
Cabrera, Miguel L. ;
Hancock, Dennis W. ;
Stewart, Lawton ;
Ney, Laura C. ;
Subedi, Anish ;
Mahmud, Kishan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (06) :1468-1477
[6]   Long-Term Corn Residue Grazing Improves Subsequent Soybean Yields in a Corn-Soybean Rotation [J].
Drewnoski, Mary E. ;
MacDonald, Jim C. ;
Erickson, Galen E. ;
Hanford, Kathy J. ;
Klopfenstein, Terry J. .
CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 2 (01)
[7]   Pasture yield and soil physical property responses to soil compaction from treading and grazing - a review [J].
Drewry, J. J. ;
Cameron, K. C. ;
Buchan, G. D. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (03) :237-256
[8]  
FASS, 2010, GUIDE CARE USE AGR A, V3rd
[9]  
FERNANDEZRIVERA S, 1989, J ANIM SCI, V67, P597
[10]  
GUTIERREZORNELAS E, 1991, J ANIM SCI, V69, P1741