Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) Facilitates Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal CT

被引:29
作者
Ellmann, Stephan [1 ]
Kammerer, Ferdinand [1 ]
Allmendinger, Thomas [2 ]
Hammon, Matthias [1 ]
Janka, Rolf [1 ]
Lell, Michael [3 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Kramer, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nuernberg, Inst Radiol, Univ Hosp Erlangen Nuernberg, Maximilianspl 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Clinicum Nuernberg, D-90419 Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
Radiation dose reduction; CT; iterative reconstruction; ADMIRE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE-QUALITY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; MULTIDETECTOR CT; NOISE-REDUCTION; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2018.01.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the potential degree of radiation dose reduction achievable using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) while maintaining image quality. Moreover, this study compared differences in image noise reduction of this iterative algorithm with radiation dose reduction. Methods: Eleven consecutive patients scheduled for abdominal CT were scanned according to our institute's standard protocol (100 kV, 289 reference mAs). Using a proprietary reconstruction software, CT images of these patients were reconstructed as either full-dose weighted filtered back projections or with simulated radiation dose reductions down to 10% of the full-dose level and ADMIRE at either strength 3 or strength 5. Images were marked with arrows pointing on anatomic structures of the abdomen, differing in their contrast to the surrounding tissue. Structures were grouped into high-, medium-, and low-contrast subgroups. In addition, the intrinsic noise of these structures was measured. That followed, image pairs were presented to observers, with five readers assessing image quality using two-alternative-forced-choice comparisons. In total, 3000 comparisons were performed that way. Results: Both ADMIRE 3 and 5 decreased noise of the anatomic structures significantly compared to the filtered back projection, with an additional significant difference between ADMIRE 3 and 5. Radiation dose reduction potential for ADMIRE ranged from 29.0% to 53.5%, with no significant differences between ADMIRE 3 and 5 within the contrast subgroups.The potential levels of radiation dose reduction for ADMIRE 3 differed significantly between high-, medium-, and low-contrast structures, whereas for ADMIRE 5, there was only a significant difference between the high- and the medium-contrast subgroups. Conclusion: Although ADMIRE 5 permits significantly higher noise reduction potential than ADMIRE 3, it does not facilitate higher levels of radiation dose reduction. ADMIRE nonetheless holds remarkable potential for radiation dose reduction, which features a certain dependency on the contrast of the structure of interest. Applying ADMIRE with a strength of 3 in abdominal CT may permit radiation dose reduction of about 30%.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1284
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Reduced Image Noise at Low-Dose Multidetector CT of the Abdomen with Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing Algorithm [J].
Lubner, Meghan G. ;
Pickhardt, Perry J. ;
Tang, Jie ;
Chen, Guang-Hong .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (01) :248-256
[12]   Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation [J].
Massoumzadeh, Parinaz ;
Don, Steven ;
Hildebolt, Charles F. ;
Bae, Kyongtae T. ;
Whiting, Bruce R. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (01) :174-189
[13]   Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [J].
Nakamoto, Atsushi ;
Kim, Tonsok ;
Hori, Masatoshi ;
Onishi, Hiromitsu ;
Tsuboyama, Takahiro ;
Sakane, Makoto ;
Tatsumi, Mitsuaki ;
Tomiyama, Noriyuki .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (09) :1715-1723
[14]   Modelling the physics in the iterative reconstruction for transmission computed tomography [J].
Nuyts, Johan ;
De Man, Bruno ;
Fessler, Jeffrey A. ;
Zbijewski, Wojciech ;
Beekman, Freek J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (12) :R63-R96
[15]   Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT [J].
Primak, Andrew N. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Fletcher, Joel G. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (06) :1785-1794
[16]  
Ramirez-Giraldo J., 2014, Med Phys, V2, P420
[17]   Noise Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography Applying Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) [J].
Schaller, Frank ;
Sedlmair, Martin ;
Raupach, Rainer ;
Uder, Michael ;
Leii, Michael .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) :1230-1238
[18]   Automated Tube Voltage Adaptation in Combination with Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Thoracoabdominal Third-Generation 192-Slice Dual-Source Computed Tomography: Effects on Image Quality and Radiation Dose [J].
Scholtz, Jan-Erik ;
Wichmann, Julian L. ;
Huesers, Kristina ;
Beeres, Martin ;
Nour-Eldin, Nour-Eldin Abdelrehim ;
Frellesen, Claudia ;
Vogl, Thomas J. ;
Lehnert, Thomas .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) :1081-1087
[19]   Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study [J].
Solomon, Justin ;
Mileto, Achille ;
Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan Carlos ;
Samei, Ehsan .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (03) :735-745
[20]   Developing optimized CT scan protocols: Phantom measurements of image quality [J].
Zarb, Francis ;
Rainford, Louise ;
McEntee, Mark F. .
RADIOGRAPHY, 2011, 17 (02) :109-114