Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) Facilitates Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal CT

被引:29
|
作者
Ellmann, Stephan [1 ]
Kammerer, Ferdinand [1 ]
Allmendinger, Thomas [2 ]
Hammon, Matthias [1 ]
Janka, Rolf [1 ]
Lell, Michael [3 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Kramer, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nuernberg, Inst Radiol, Univ Hosp Erlangen Nuernberg, Maximilianspl 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Clinicum Nuernberg, D-90419 Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
Radiation dose reduction; CT; iterative reconstruction; ADMIRE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE-QUALITY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; MULTIDETECTOR CT; NOISE-REDUCTION; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2018.01.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the potential degree of radiation dose reduction achievable using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) while maintaining image quality. Moreover, this study compared differences in image noise reduction of this iterative algorithm with radiation dose reduction. Methods: Eleven consecutive patients scheduled for abdominal CT were scanned according to our institute's standard protocol (100 kV, 289 reference mAs). Using a proprietary reconstruction software, CT images of these patients were reconstructed as either full-dose weighted filtered back projections or with simulated radiation dose reductions down to 10% of the full-dose level and ADMIRE at either strength 3 or strength 5. Images were marked with arrows pointing on anatomic structures of the abdomen, differing in their contrast to the surrounding tissue. Structures were grouped into high-, medium-, and low-contrast subgroups. In addition, the intrinsic noise of these structures was measured. That followed, image pairs were presented to observers, with five readers assessing image quality using two-alternative-forced-choice comparisons. In total, 3000 comparisons were performed that way. Results: Both ADMIRE 3 and 5 decreased noise of the anatomic structures significantly compared to the filtered back projection, with an additional significant difference between ADMIRE 3 and 5. Radiation dose reduction potential for ADMIRE ranged from 29.0% to 53.5%, with no significant differences between ADMIRE 3 and 5 within the contrast subgroups.The potential levels of radiation dose reduction for ADMIRE 3 differed significantly between high-, medium-, and low-contrast structures, whereas for ADMIRE 5, there was only a significant difference between the high- and the medium-contrast subgroups. Conclusion: Although ADMIRE 5 permits significantly higher noise reduction potential than ADMIRE 3, it does not facilitate higher levels of radiation dose reduction. ADMIRE nonetheless holds remarkable potential for radiation dose reduction, which features a certain dependency on the contrast of the structure of interest. Applying ADMIRE with a strength of 3 in abdominal CT may permit radiation dose reduction of about 30%.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1284
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMAGE QUALITY AND POTENTIAL DOSE REDUCTION USING ADVANCED MODELED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (ADMIRE) IN ABDOMINAL CT - A REVIEW
    Kataria, B.
    Althen, J. Nilsson
    Smedby, O.
    Persson, A.
    Sokjer, H.
    Sandborg, M.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2021, 195 (3-4) : 177 - 187
  • [2] Noise Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography Applying Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE)
    Schaller, Frank
    Sedlmair, Martin
    Raupach, Rainer
    Uder, Michael
    Leii, Michael
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 1230 - 1238
  • [3] Visual impression and texture analysis of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE): improved assessment of image quality in CT for better estimation of dose reduction potential
    Alikhani, Babak
    Raatschen, Hans-Juergen
    Wacker, Frank
    Werncke, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (03)
  • [4] Pediatric head computed tomography with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction: focus on image quality and reduction of radiation dose
    Cho, Hyun-Hae
    Lee, So Mi
    You, Sun Kyoung
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 50 (02) : 242 - 251
  • [5] Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    Woisetschlager, Mischa
    Dahlstrom, Nils
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Lindblom, Maria
    Choy, Garry
    Quick, Petter
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Sedlmair, Martin
    Blake, Michael A.
    Persson, Anders
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [6] Effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose reduction and diagnostic accuracy of pediatric abdominal CT
    Bae, Sohi
    Kim, Myung-Joon
    Yoon, Choon-Sik
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Hong, Jung Hwa
    Lee, Mi-Jung
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 44 (12) : 1541 - 1547
  • [7] Pediatric head computed tomography with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction: focus on image quality and reduction of radiation dose
    Hyun-Hae Cho
    So Mi Lee
    Sun Kyoung You
    Pediatric Radiology, 2020, 50 : 242 - 251
  • [8] Performance of Iterative Reconstruction and Automated Tube Voltage Selection on the Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Abdominal CT Scans
    Desai, Gaurav S.
    Orrego, Jorge M. Fuentes
    Kambadakone, Avinash R.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (06) : 897 - 903
  • [9] Radiation Dose Reduction via Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction and Automatic Tube Voltage Modulation (CARE kV) in Abdominal CT
    Shin, Hyun Joo
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Lee, Young Han
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Ki Whang
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (06) : 886 - 893
  • [10] CT Radiation Dose and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques
    Padole, Atul
    Khawaja, Ranish Deedar Ali
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (04) : W384 - W387