Response of the posterior in situ keratomileusis for corneal surface to laser myopia

被引:48
作者
Twa, MD
Roberts, C
Mahmoud, AM
Chang, JS
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Hong Kong Sanat & Hosp, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.032
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the response of the posterior corneal surface in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and determine whether residual stromal bed thickness or treatment magnitude is predictive of the posterior corneal surface elevation after uneventful LASIK. Setting: A private hospital-based refractive surgery practice, Hong Kong SAR, China. Methods: Orbscan I (Bausch & Lomb) videokeratography examinations were performed on 1124 patients before and 6 months after LASIK for myopia (mean -6.81 diopters [D] +/- 2.52 [SDI; range -0.88 to - 14.50 D). The best-fit sphere (BFS) over the central 9.0 mm region of the posterior corneal surface before and after treatment was compared. The location and magnitude of the 1.0 mm diameter region of highest elevation above the BFS for the central 4.0 mm diameter zone were calculated before and after treatment and compared using a paired t test. Stepwise regression was used to model the best predictors of the posterior radius of the BFS and the central elevation of the corneal surface above the BFS before and after treatment. Results: The mean radius of curvature of the posterior surface BFS decreased 0.10 mm after LASIK, from 6.31 to 6.21 mm (P<.001). Elevation above this BFS was increased 10 mu m within a 1.00 mm diameter region of interest, and this was correlated with postoperative corneal thickness, inferotemporal clecentration of the highest point, residual myopia, and steeper central posterior radius of curvature. Conclusions: No eye was diagnosed with corneal ectasia at the time of the 6-month postoperative visit. After LASIK, there was a decreased radius of curvature for the BFS of the posterior corneal surface, with the highest elevation point located paracentrally. These findings are similar to the anterior corneal surface changes observed in corneal ectasia after LASIK but smaller in magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 71
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than-4.0 to-7.0 diopters of myopia [J].
Amoils, SP ;
Deist, MB ;
Gous, P ;
Amoils, PM .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (07) :967-977
[2]   Factors affecting the forward shift of posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Baek, TM ;
Lee, KH ;
Kagaya, F ;
Tomidokoro, A ;
Amano, S ;
Oshika, T .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (02) :317-320
[3]  
Bruno CR, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, pS605
[4]   Contact lens fitting in a patient with keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Eggink, FAGJ ;
Beekhuis, WH .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (07) :1119-1123
[5]  
Kamiya Kazutaka, 2003, Semin Ophthalmol, V18, P17, DOI 10.1080/08820530390897756
[6]   Early spatial changes in the posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Lee, DH ;
Seo, S ;
Jeong, KW ;
Shin, SC ;
Vukich, JA .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (04) :778-784
[7]   The repeatability of corneal thickness measures [J].
Marsich, MM ;
Bullimore, MA .
CORNEA, 2000, 19 (06) :792-795
[8]   Time course of changes in corneal forward shift after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Miyata, K ;
Kamiya, K ;
Takahashi, T ;
Tanabe, T ;
Tokunaga, T ;
Amano, S ;
Oshika, T .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 120 (07) :896-900
[9]   Changes in posterior corneal curvature after photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Naroo, SA ;
Charman, WN .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (06) :872-878
[10]   Keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): Evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness [J].
Ou, RJ ;
Shaw, EL ;
Glasgow, BJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 134 (05) :771-773