Application of Bayesian Regularization Artificial Neural Network in explosion risk analysis of fixed offshore platform

被引:76
作者
Shi, Jihao [1 ]
Zhu, Yuan [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [2 ]
Chen, Guoming [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Ctr Offshore Engn & Safety Technol, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, C RISE, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
基金
国家重点研发计划; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Explosion risk analysis; Transient bayesian regularization artificial neuron network; Frozen cloud approach; Computational fluid dynamics; FREQUENCY-DISTRIBUTION; GAS DISPERSION; VAPOR CLOUD; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2018.10.009
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is routinely used in Explosion Risk Analysis (ERA), as CFD-based ERA offers a good understanding of underlying physics accidental loads. Generally, simplifications were incorporated into CFD-based ERA to limit the number of simulations. Frozen Cloud Approach (FCA) is a frequently used simplification in the dispersion part of the CFD-based ERA procedure. However, its accuracy is questionable in the complex and congested environment such as offshore facility. Furthermore, in explosion part, some specific techniques, e.g. linear/double bin-interpolated techniques have been proposed while the corresponding accuracy is still unknown since the developers did not yet check their accuracy by considering the explosion computational data as the benchmark. This study presents a more accurate algorithm, namely Bayesian Regularization Artificial Neural Network (BRANN) and accordingly proposes the frameworks regarding BRANN-based models for the CFD-based ERA procedure. Firstly, the framework is proposed to develop the Transient-BRANN (TBRANN) model for transient dispersion study. In addition, the framework to determine the BRANN model for explosion study is developed. The proposed frameworks are explained by a case study of the fixed offshore platform. Consequently, this study confirms the more accuracy of the TBRANN model over FCA and the accuracy of BRANN model for CFD-based ERA.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Dynamic failure analysis of process systems using neural networks [J].
Adedigba, Sunday A. ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Yang, Ming .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 111 :529-543
[2]  
Alghamdi S., 2012, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NORSOK Standard Z- 013
[4]   Influence of scenario choices when performing CFD simulations for explosion risk analyses: Focus on dispersion [J].
Azzi, Camille ;
Rogstadkjernet, Lars ;
van Wingerden, Kees ;
Choi, Jeawoong ;
Ryu, Yonghee .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 41 :87-96
[5]  
Bakke J. R, 2003, FABIG NEWSLETTER, V34, pR469
[6]   A Network Based Approach to Envisage Potential Accidents in Offshore Process Facilities [J].
Baksh, Al-Amin ;
Abbassi, Rouzbeh ;
Garaniya, Vikram ;
Khan, Faisal .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2017, 36 (02) :178-191
[7]  
Davis S., 2011, P 7 GLOB C PROC SAF
[8]   Major accident modelling using spare data [J].
El-Gheriani, Malak ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Chen, Dan ;
Abbassi, Rouzbeh .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 106 :52-59
[9]  
GexCon, 2015, FLACS V10 4 US MAN
[10]   A CFD based explosion risk analysis methodology using time varying release rates in dispersion simulations [J].
Gupta, Sharad ;
Chan, Sunny .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 39 :59-67