Benchmarking gentrification near commuter rail stations in New Jersey

被引:23
作者
Deka, Devajyoti [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
benchmarking; commuter rail; displacement; gentrification; rail station; TRANSIT SYSTEMS; VALUES; CAR;
D O I
10.1177/0042098016664830
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Predictions in recent studies that an increasingly large number of households will locate near rail stations because of changing lifestyles and perceptions of younger generations should be a reason for concern for transportation planners as excessively high demand for housing near stations can displace disadvantaged populations. In New Jersey, where the statewide Transit Village programme was introduced in 1999 to promote transit-oriented developments (TOD), many communities with rail stations are currently inhabited by low-income and minority populations. While gentrification through TODs can have many environmental and economic benefits, caution is needed to ensure that it does not displace disadvantaged households. With this assertion, the study sets benchmarks for current population characteristics of the areas near commuter rail stations in New Jersey and compares changes of the characteristics between 1990 and 2013 by using the Geolytics Neighborhood Change Database. Specifically, it compares the socioeconomic characteristics of the areas near stations with the areas further both at the macro and the micro levels by focusing on race, ethnicity, income, rent and other key variables. The study uses analysis of variance and regression models to compare areas near stations with areas beyond. Although the regression models showed higher home value and greater increase in home value near stations than areas further, change in rent has been more stable. The analysis did not reveal significant undesirable changes in population characteristics in the areas near stations, especially for the variables on race and ethnicity.
引用
收藏
页码:2955 / 2972
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], TRANSIT ORIENTED DEV
  • [2] Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development
    Bartholomew, Keith
    Ewing, Reid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2011, 26 (01) : 18 - 34
  • [3] Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2015, CPI INFL CALC
  • [4] Center for Transit Oriented Development, 2004, HIDD PLAIN SIGHT CAP
  • [5] Chetty RajNathaniel Hendren., 2015, IMPACTS NEIGHBORHOOD
  • [6] Changing demographics and young adult driver license decline in Melbourne, Australia (1994-2009)
    Delbosc, Alexa
    Currie, Graham
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2014, 41 (03) : 529 - 542
  • [7] Diaz R.B., 1999, Commuter Rail/Rapid Transit Conference, P1
  • [8] Dutzik T., 2014, Millennials in motion: changing travel habits of young Americans and the implications for public policy
  • [9] How low income neighborhoods change: Entry, exit, and enhancement
    Ellen, Ingrid Gould
    O'Regan, Katherine M.
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 41 (02) : 89 - 97
  • [10] Evans T, 2015, TRACK ASSESSMENT MIX