Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review

被引:173
作者
Schellingerhout, Jasper M. [1 ]
Verhagen, Arianne P. [1 ]
Heymans, Martijn W. [2 ,3 ]
Koes, Bart W. [1 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. [2 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Methodol & Appl Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Neck pain; Neck disability; Questionnaire; Pain measurement; Validation studies; Reproducibility of results; Psychometrics; Systematic review; COMPREHENSIVE OUTCOME MEASURE; UPDATED METHOD GUIDELINES; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DISABILITY-INDEX; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BOURNEMOUTH QUESTIONNAIRE; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; COSMIN CHECKLIST; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of the original versions of neck-specific questionnaires. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched for articles concerning the development or evaluation of the measurement properties of an original version of a self-reported questionnaire, evaluating pain and/or disability, which was specifically developed or adapted for patients with neck pain. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using a checklist, specifically designed for evaluating studies on measurement properties. Results The search strategy resulted in a total of 3,641 unique hits, of which 25 articles, evaluating 8 different questionnaires, were included in our study. The Neck Disability Index is the most frequently evaluated questionnaire and shows positive results for internal consistency, content validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness, but a negative result for reliability. The other questionnaires show positive results, but the evidence for each measurement property is mostly limited, and at least 50% of the information on measurement properties per questionnaire is lacking. Conclusions Our findings imply that studies of high methodological quality are needed to properly assess the measurement properties of the currently available questionnaires. Until high quality studies are available, we recommend using these questionnaires with caution. There is no need for the development of new neck-specific questionnaires until the current questionnaires have been adequately assessed.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 670
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [2] The Bournemouth questionnaire: A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. I. Psychometric properties in back pain patients
    Bolton, JE
    Breen, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 22 (08) : 503 - 510
  • [3] Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: Detecting clinically significant improvement
    Bolton, JE
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) : 2410 - 2417
  • [4] The Bournemouth Questionnaire: A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients
    Bolton, JE
    Humphreys, BK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 25 (03) : 141 - 148
  • [5] Chok B., 2000, PHYSIOTHER SINGAPORE, V3, P16
  • [6] The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy
    Cleland, JA
    Fritz, JM
    Whitman, JM
    Palmer, JA
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (05) : 598 - 602
  • [7] Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Childs, John A.
    Whitman, Julie M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (01): : 69 - 74
  • [8] Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing
    Costa, Luciola da Cunha Menezes
    Maher, Christopher G.
    McAuley, James H.
    Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (09) : 934 - 943
  • [9] When to use agreement versus reliability measures
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) : 1033 - 1039
  • [10] Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use
    Deyo, RA
    Battie, M
    Beurskens, AJHM
    Bombardier, C
    Croft, P
    Koes, B
    Malmivaara, A
    Roland, M
    Von Korff, M
    Waddell, G
    [J]. SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) : 2003 - 2013