On process optimization considering LCA methodology

被引:152
作者
Pieragostini, Carla [1 ]
Mussati, Miguel C. [1 ]
Aguirre, Pio [1 ]
机构
[1] INGAR Inst Desarrollo & Diseno CONICET UTN, Santa Fe, Argentina
关键词
LCIA methods; LCA software; Optimization techniques; Integrated LCA-optimization frameworks; LIFE-CYCLE-ASSESSMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; TOXIC-SUBSTANCES; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; PART I; MODEL; DESIGN; SELECTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this work is to research the state-of-the-art in process optimization techniques and tools based on LCA, focused in the process engineering field. A collection of methods, approaches, applications, specific software packages, and insights regarding experiences and progress made in applying the LCA methodology coupled to optimization frameworks is provided, and general trends are identified. The "cradle-to-gate" concept to define the system boundaries is the most used approach in practice, instead of the "cradle-to-grave" approach. Normally, the relationship between inventory data and impact category indicators is linearly expressed by the characterization factors; then, synergic effects of the contaminants are neglected. Among the LCIA methods, the eco-indicator 99, which is based on the endpoint category and the panel method, is the most used in practice. A single environmental impact function, resulting from the aggregation of environmental impacts, is formulated as the environmental objective in most analyzed cases. SimaPro is the most used software for LCA applications in literature analyzed. The multi-objective optimization is the most used approach for dealing with this kind of problems, where the epsilon-constraint method for generating the Pareto set is the most applied technique. However, a renewed interest in formulating a single economic objective function in optimization frameworks can be observed, favored by the development of life cycle cost software and progress made in assessing costs of environmental externalities. Finally, a trend to deal with multi-period scenarios into integrated LCA-optimization frameworks can be distinguished providing more accurate results upon data availability. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 111 条
[81]  
Portner H.O., 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009325844
[82]   Predicted Environmental Impact and Expected Occurrence of Actual Environmental Impact Part I: The Linear Nature of Environmental Impact from Emissions in Life-Cycle Assessment [J].
Potting, Jose ;
Hauschild, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1997, 2 (03) :171-177
[83]   RELATION BETWEEN MILP MODELING AND LOGICAL INFERENCE FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SYNTHESIS [J].
RAMAN, R ;
GROSSMANN, IE .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 15 (02) :73-84
[84]   MODELING AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES FOR LOGIC-BASED INTEGER PROGRAMMING [J].
RAMAN, R ;
GROSSMANN, IE .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 18 (07) :563-578
[85]   Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications [J].
Rebitzer, G ;
Ekvall, T ;
Frischknecht, R ;
Hunkeler, D ;
Norris, G ;
Rydberg, T ;
Schmidt, WP ;
Suh, S ;
Weidema, BP ;
Pennington, DW .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 30 (05) :701-720
[86]  
Reis M, 2001, CUSTOS AMBIENTAIS AS
[87]  
RIVM VROM WVC, 1994, UN SYST EV SUBST USE
[88]   Fuzzy linear programming and applications [J].
Rommelfanger, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 92 (03) :512-527
[89]   USEtox-the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment [J].
Rosenbaum, Ralph K. ;
Bachmann, Till M. ;
Gold, Lois Swirsky ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ;
Jolliet, Olivier ;
Juraske, Ronnie ;
Koehler, Annette ;
Larsen, Henrik F. ;
MacLeod, Matthew ;
Margni, Manuele ;
McKone, Thomas E. ;
Payet, Jerome ;
Schuhmacher, Marta ;
van de Meent, Dik ;
Hauschild, Michael Z. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (07) :532-546
[90]   A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: a case study of drilling waste [J].
Sadiq, R ;
Husain, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (01) :33-46