Who am I? Key influences on the formation of academic identity within a faculty development program

被引:55
作者
Lieff, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Baker, Lindsay
Mori, Brenda [2 ]
Egan-Lee, Eileen
Chin, Kevin [3 ]
Reeves, Scott [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Int Healthcare Educ Ctr, Ctr Fac Dev,Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PERCEPTIONS; TEACHER; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2012.642827
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Professional identity encompasses how individuals understand themselves, interpret experiences, present themselves, wish to be perceived, and are recognized by the broader professional community. For health professional and health science educators, their 'academic' professional identity is situated within their academic community and plays an integral role in their well being and productivity. This study aims to explore factors that contribute to the formation and growth of academic identity (AI) within the context of a longitudinal faculty development program. Methods: Using a qualitative case study approach, data from three cohorts of a 2-year faculty development program were explored and analyzed for emerging issues and themes related to AI. Results: Factors salient to the formation of AI were grouped into three major domains: personal (cognitive and emotional factors unique to each individual); relational (connections and interactions with others); and contextual (the program itself and external work environments). Discussion: Faculty development initiatives not only aim to develop knowledge, skills, and attitudes, but also contribute to the formation of academic identities in a number of different ways. Facilitating the growth of AI has the potential to increase faculty motivation, satisfaction, and productivity. Faculty developers need to be mindful of factors within the personal, relational, and contextual domains when considering issues of program design and implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:E208 / E215
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Arreola RA, 2009, METAPROFESSIONAL PRO
[2]   Active location in teachers' construction of their professional identities [J].
Coldron, J ;
Smith, R .
JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 1999, 31 (06) :711-726
[3]   Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers' identities: A multi-perspective study [J].
Flores, MA ;
Day, C .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2006, 22 (02) :219-232
[4]  
Gee JP., 2000, Rev. Res. Educ, V25, P99, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1167322, DOI 10.3102/0091732X025001099]
[5]  
Glaser B., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO, DOI DOI 10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
[7]  
Krueger R, 2009, Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research
[8]   Evolving Curriculum Design: A Novel Framework for Continuous, Timely, and Relevant Curriculum Adaptation in Faculty Development [J].
Lieff, Susan Janet .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2009, 84 (01) :127-134
[9]  
Lincoln Y., 1985, NATURALISTIC INQUIRY
[10]   The Personal and Professional Impact of a Fellowship in Medical Education [J].
Lown, Beth A. ;
Newman, Lori R. ;
Hatem, Charles J. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2009, 84 (08) :1089-1097