Which health and biomedical topics generate the most Facebook interest and the strongest citation relationships?

被引:23
作者
Mohammadi, Ehsan [1 ]
Gregory, Karl B. [2 ]
Thelwall, Mike [3 ]
Barahmand, Nilofar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Coll Informat & Commun, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Dept Stat, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ Wolverhampton, Sch Math & Comp Sci, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wolverhampton, England
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Scientometr Div, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Facebook; Sciecne and society; Social media; Altmetrics; Social media analysis; SUBJECT-HEADINGS MESH; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIETAL IMPACT; CANCER-RESEARCH; INFORMATION; WEB; ALTMETRIC.COM; KNOWLEDGE; JOURNALS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102230
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although more than a million academic papers have been posted on Facebook, there is little detailed research about which fields or cross-field issues are involved and whether there are field or public interest relationships between Facebook mentions and future citations. In response, we identified health and biomedical scientific papers mentioned on Facebook and assigned subjects to them using the MeSH and Science Metrix journal classification schema. Multistage adaptive LASSO and unpenalized least-squares regressions were used to model Facebook mentions by fields and MeSH terms. The fields Science and Technology, General and Internal Medicine, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Sport Sciences produced higher Facebook mention counts than average. However, no MeSH cross-field issue differences were found in the rate of attracting Facebook mentions. The relationship between Facebook mentions and citations varies between both fields and MeSH cross-field issues. General and Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular System and Hematology and Developmental Biology have strongest correlations between Facebook mentions and citations, probably due to high citation rates and high Facebook visibility in these areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement [J].
Abramo, Giovanni .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2018, 12 (03) :590-597
[3]  
[Anonymous], 23 INT C SCI TECHN I
[4]  
[Anonymous], FACTORS ASS FUT CIT
[5]  
[Anonymous], ICONFERENCE
[6]  
[Anonymous], IM NIH RES
[7]  
[Anonymous], WORLD INT US 2019 PO
[8]  
Archambault É, 2011, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P66
[9]   Local chatter or international buzz? Language differences on posts about Zika research on Twitter and Facebook [J].
Barata, Germana ;
Shores, Kenneth ;
Alperin, Juan Pablo .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[10]   What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers [J].
Bartlett, C ;
Sterne, J ;
Egger, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7355) :81-84